The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
The first of the many incidents that soon after this conversation began
to follow each other closely, took place on the 10th May 1876, when
an assemblage of several thousand Softas stopped Prince Izzeddine, the
Sultan’s eldest son, on his way to the Seraskierat (Ministry of War),
desiring him to return to the Palace, and to inform the Sultan that
they demanded the dismissal of Mahmoud Nedim, the Grand Vizier and of
Hassan Fehmi Effendi, the Sheik‐ul‐Islam. The Sultan did not venture to
reject the demand. Mahmoud and Hassan Fehmi were dismissed, the latter
being replaced by Hassan Hairullah Effendi, who enjoyed a high and
exceptional reputation for learning and enlightenment. Mehemet Rushdi
Pasha, an old man universally respected, was named Grand Vizier; and as
he insisted on Midhat joining his Cabinet (although holding no specific
office), it was believed that he would be the guiding spirit, and
general satisfaction was felt. Sir Henry Elliot proceeds to say:
“This general satisfaction did not last long. The Sultan quickly
showed his determination to resist all reforms by appointing to high
posts several of the worst of the old school of Pashas, and it then
became so evident to me that an attempt to depose him would certainly
very shortly be made, that on the 25th May I put my conviction on
record in a despatch in which I wrote that the word ‘Constitution’
was in every mouth; that the Softas, representing the intelligent
public opinion of the Capital, knowing themselves to be supported by
the bulk of the Nation—Christian as well as Mahomedan—would not, I
believed, relax their efforts till they obtained it, and that should
the Sultan refuse to grant it, an attempt to depose him appeared
almost inevitable; that texts from the Koran were circulated proving
to the faithful that the form of Government sanctioned by it was
properly democratic, and that the absolute authority now wielded by
the Sovereign was an usurpation of the rights of the people and not
sanctioned by the Sacred Law; and both texts and precedents were
appealed to to show that allegiance was not due to a Sovereign who
neglected the interests of the State. The disaffection, I said, now
ran through every class, and from the Pashas down to the porters
in the streets and the boatmen on the Bosphorus, no one thought any
longer of concealing his opinions.... Within a week after my reports
were written, the deposition had been effected....”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account