Thus myriads of irritant particles are disseminated and subtly
introduced into every part of the nest. The shirt of Nessus burnt the
veins of whoso wore it; the silk of the Processionary, another poisoned
fabric, sets on fire the fingers that handle it.
The loathsome hairs long retain their virulence. I was once sorting out
some handfuls of cocoons, many of which were diseased. As the hardness
of the contents was usually an indication that something was wrong, I
tore open the doubtful cocoons with my fingers, in order to save the
non-contaminated chrysalids. My sorting was rewarded with the same kind
of pain, especially under the edges of the nails, as I had already
suffered when tearing the nests.
The cause of the irritation on this occasion was sometimes the dry skin
discarded by the Processionary on becoming a chrysalis and sometimes
the shrivelled caterpillar turned into a sort of chalky cylinder
through the invasion of the malignant fungus. Six months later, these
wretched cocoons were still capable of producing redness and
irritation.
Examined under the microscope, the russet hairs, the cause of the
itching, are stiff rods, very sharp at either end and armed with barbs
along the upper half. Their structure has absolutely nothing in common
with nettle-hairs, those tapering phials whose hard point snaps off,
pouring an irritant fluid into the tiny wound.
The plant from whose Latin name, Urtica, we derive the word urtication
borrowed the design of its weapon from the fangs of the venomous
serpents; it obtains its effect, not by the wound, but by the poison
introduced into the wound. The Processionary employs a different
method. The hairs, which have naught resembling the ampullary reservoir
of the nettle-hairs, must be poisoned on the surface, like the assegais
of the Kafirs and Zulus.
Do they really penetrate the epidermis? Are they like the savage’s
javelin, which cannot be extracted once it has gone in? With their
barbs, do they enter all the more deeply because of the quivering of
the outraged flesh? There is no ground for believing anything of the
kind. In vain do I scrutinize the injured spot through the
magnifying-glass; I can see no sign of the implanted dart. Neither
could Réaumur, when an encounter with the Oak Processionary set him
scratching himself. He had his suspicions, but could state nothing
definitely.
No; despite their sharp points and their barbs, which make them, under
the microscope, such formidable spears, the Processionary’s russet
hairs are not darts designed to imbed themselves in the skin and to
provoke irritation by pricking.
Many caterpillars, all most inoffensive, have a coat of bristles which,
under the microscope, resolve themselves into barbed javelins, quite
harmless in spite of their threatening aspect. Let me mention a couple
of these peaceable halberdiers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account