The Little Review, January 1915 (Vol. 1, No. 10)Various
General
The Little Review, January 1915 (Vol. 1, No. 10)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
We’re girls adrift on a raft and we can’t swim. Over there’s the
land of marriage with the children, the homes and the husbands;
we’ve no means of getting to it. Unless some of the men see us
and put out in boats to our rescue, we’ll be swept into the
hunger of mid-ocean. But they’re too busy to notice us.... Always
wanting, wanting, wanting the things that only men can give....
Did men ever want to be married or was it always necessary to
catch them?
In _Man and Superman_ we find a more liberal statement:
To a woman, a man is only a means to the end of getting children
and rearing them. Vitality in woman is a blind fury of creation.
What other work has she in life but to get a husband? It is a
woman’s business to get married as soon as possible, and a man’s
to keep unmarried as long as he can.... You think that you are
the pursuer, and she pursued. Fool, it is you who are the
pursued, the destined prey.
During the last few years stories and plays exploiting this doctrine
have been hurled thick and fast in the attempt to batter down so-called
romantic love, romantic though fortified not only by the fancies of the
poets and novelists but also by the analyses of the scientists and the
experiences of life. According to these stories, love is nothing more or
less than a passion for reproduction, a desire for children. This idea
is being emphasized by two very different types for two very different
reasons: one tries to make a Don Quixote of romantic love and hopes by
ridicule to eliminate it as the great motive and to give some of the
other passions a chance in literature; the other considers everything
even suggestive of sex unmoral, and so searches for an excuse to justify
the gratification of a natural craving. Neither satire nor platitudes
can alter nature.
Love, they say, considered as intense personal affection is an idea
purely fanciful, romantic. If so to consider it is romantic, scientists
are romantic; for such men as Lankester and Pycraft say “the view that
the sequel of mate hunger is the dominant instinct has no foundation in
fact. Desire for the sake of the pleasure of its gratification, not its
consequences, is the only hold on life which any race possesses. Love is
the attribute upon which this preservation of the race depends.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account