The Little Review, January 1915 (Vol. 1, No. 10)Various
General
The Little Review, January 1915 (Vol. 1, No. 10)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
Most of these false notes come from the fact that the theories of the
author and the actions of his characters are not in harmony. Whenever I
hear writers talking of such discords and saying that they are obliged
to let their characters work out their own salvations, I always consider
the attitude an affectation. But I have changed my mind. Dawson seems to
be left alone on his Raft, shouting his untenable theories till he is
hoarse; while his characters, ignoring him, have reached land and are
living their own lives. I found myself in the absurd position of
resenting the author’s interference with those vivid, distinctive,
powerful characters he had created; of wanting to tell him to keep his
hands off, and let them tell their own story.
And left to themselves they tell it unflinchingly. What if the treatment
is obvious and conventional? It is obvious treatment of the great
mysteries of life; conventional treatment of its beauties.
The advancement of science at the expense of man is one of the
most pernicious things in the world. The stunted man is a
retrogression in the human race: he throws a shadow over all
succeeding generations. The tendencies and natural purpose of the
individual science become degenerate, and science itself is
finally shipwrecked: it has made progress, but has either no
effect at all on life or else an immoral one.—_Nietzsche._
Sentence Reviews
_Gustave Flaubert_, by Emile Faguet. _Balzac_, by the same author.
[Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.] Emile Faguet is a critic of the old
school, an academician. He analyzes the writers thoroughly, profoundly,
comprehensively, applying a uniform scholarly method. He gives the
biographies of Flaubert and Balzac, reviews their works, and finally
discusses their general importance for literature. You do not find any
sparkling revelations or extraordinary insight, but you form an adequate
opinion of the chief characteristics of the two great Frenchmen. The
translations are good; Mr. Thorley, who did the Balzac, has proved that
in the rôle of a translator he runs less risk than when undertaking to
interpret Verlaine.
_Bahaism: The Modern Social Religion_, by Horace Holley. [Mitchell
Kennerley, New York.] Another example of overestimation of Oriental
thought. The success of Tagore’s second-rate allegories gave Mr. Holley
the idea of displaying before the ever-thirsting Western mind another
Eastern “great”. Bahaism, as interpreted by the writer, is one of the
“57 varieties” of the blessed Christian Socialism. The world must be
reformed, nicely, humbly, altruistically, without causing any damage to
State and Society. Naive and dull like a Sunday sermon at an Ethical
Society.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account