The Little Review, July 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 5)Various
General
The Little Review, July 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 5)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
Prince Myshkin is the central figure of the novel; he is the "idiot,"
and everybody abuses him. He is insulted and beaten, and robbed and
deceived and loved. He is the most singular figure in literature--he is
Dostoevsky himself.
But he is not an idiot in any sense. He is so profoundly simple and
wise, and has such great faith in human beings, that he is mistaken by
the men and women of ordinary passions as a fool. While he can be
readily toyed with by women--a significant phase of the writer's own
attitude toward the sex--Prince Myshkin is regarded by them from a
common basis of understanding. For them he holds no quality of sex.
"Perhaps you don't know that, owing to my illness," he says (he too is
an epileptic), "I know nothing of women."
It is in _The Idiot_ that Dostoevsky's women are at least life-like. The
Epanchin sisters, especially the youngest, Aglaia, are not "types" in
the usual sense, but preconceived studies. The pages devoted to Aglaia's
love affair with Prince Myshkin are of the happiest in the book.
Besides the books I have already mentioned, the more important works are
_The Possessed_, in which national politics play a large part; _Poor
Folk_, the story of a poor clerk's love for a poor woman who eventually
turns from him; and _Letters from a Dead House_. This last is a book of
personal experiences, and reveals Dostoevsky's relations with the
criminals with whom he was imprisoned in Siberia. The mental temper of
men who disregard and break the common and social laws, is set forth
with the passionate curiosity that lies behind all his probings of the
human soul. I am strongly tempted to offer quotations; to show, in this
passage or that, how deeply Dostoevsky looked into the most extreme
boundaries of human sensibilities; but on the whole extracts from his
writings would do more harm than good. His work is so disconnected,
though not in any sense detached, that extracts could not serve here to
indicate the amazing clarity of his vision.
His books arouse a feeling of wonder that there can be so many things in
our own individual emotions with which we never before came into
contact. He moves us so profoundly because he tears his men and women
out of their morally-bound lives and makes them confront stupendous
questions--the questions of life. He plies detail upon detail of human
misery until one feels that the whole world is reeling from him--then
grows aware of the sweet white glow of Dostoevsky's faith, and feels
that life can hold no terrors--that he is above the petty miseries of
human strife! That is why I say Dostoevsky's optimism is of the new high
order.
Dostoevsky purges one's mind. He makes you conscious of the beauty of a
soul.
BOOK DISCUSSION
AN UNREELING REALIST
_The Titan_, by Theodore Dreiser [John Lane Company, New York]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account