The Little Review, May 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 3)Various
General
The Little Review, May 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 3)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
I had a big day with Ruby Davis, our Chicago little violinist, out in
the country, roaming, climbing, racing, conversing, but not talking.
Talk we left behind us, in the city drawing-rooms. Between pranks and
escapades we found rest in sitting side by side and reading Kreisler’s
war impressions. I knew that Ruby worshipped Fritz, but his reflections
on the book of the violinist have shown me that in addition to
admiration he possesses critical perception. We delighted in the pages
written with spontaneous beauty, without pose, without the banal
superstructure of sentimental colors, but revealing a tense, vibrating,
virile artistic heart, reservedly sensitive to bloody horrors as well as
to imperceptible impressions of human emotions concealed beneath the
dehumanizing military uniform. Ruby called my attention to the fact that
only such an artist as Kreisler could have had a broad non-professional
outlook on men and things, an artist of unusual versatility, of a wide
education, of rich experiences in various fields of life. Yet, he added,
only the keen, delicate ear of a musician could have perceived the
symphonic sounds on the battle-field and in the trenches, as, for
instance, in this passage:
My ear, accustomed to differentiate sounds of all kinds, had some
time ago, while we were still advancing, noted a remarkable
discrepancy in the peculiar whine produced by the different
shells in their rapid flight through the air as they passed over
our heads, some sounding shrill, with a rising tendency, and the
other rather dull, with a falling cadence. A short observation
revealed the fact that the passing of a dull sounding shell was
invariably preceded by a flash from one of our own cannon in the
rear on the hill, which conclusively proved it to be an Austrian
shell. It must be understood that as we were advancing between
the positions of the Austrian and Russian artillery, both kinds
of shells were passing over our heads. As we advanced the
difference between shrill and dull shell grew less and less
perceptible, until I could hardly tell them apart. Upon nearing
the hill the difference increased again more and more until on
the hill itself it was very marked. After our trench was finished
I crawled to the top of the hill until I could make out the flash
of the Russian guns on the opposite heights and by timing flash
and actual passing of the shell, found to my astonishment that
now the Russian missiles had become dull, while on the other
hand, the shrill sound was invariably heralded by a flash from
one of our guns, now far in the rear. What had happened was this:
Every shell describes in its course a parabolic line, with the
first half of the curve being ascending and the second one
descending. Apparently in the first half of its curve, that is,
its course while ascending, the shell produced a dull whine
accompanied by a falling cadence, which changes to a rising
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account