The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count KönigsmarckWilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
History
The love of an uncrowned queen : $b Sophie Dorothea, consort of George I, and her correspondence with Philip Christopher, Count Königsmarck
Wilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
Königsmarck, Christopher von, 1665-1694; Sophia Dorothea, consort of George I, King of Great Britain, 1666-1726
George William was delighted to play the host again to his favourite
brother and his respected sister-in-law. The betrothal was announced
with much pomp. There were great feasts at Celle, and every one came to
congratulate. All the neighbouring princes, with the exception of
Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, and all the great officers of both duchies, were
delighted at the betrothal. Indeed, the advantages seemed many and
obvious, and Eléonore, seeing how strongly the tide of popular feeling
was against her, to say nothing of George William’s obstinacy, had
perforce to give way, hide her mortification as best she could, and
counsel her daughter to submission to the will of her father. It was not
an easy task, for Sophie Dorothea had a will and temper of her own, but
she was brought to some show of outward complaisance, and induced to
passively receive the congratulations of the court and the unwilling
wooing of her betrothed.
George William, Ernest Augustus, and Sophia agreed that, as there was no
reason for delay, the marriage should be celebrated as soon as the
necessary formalities and settlements were completed. Platen and
Bernstorff were called in to help and advise, and lengthy deeds were
drawn up. Eléonore seems to have been too heartsick to interfere, or
perhaps she was powerless, for in the marriage settlement Ernest
Augustus and Sophia had everything their own way, and Sophie Dorothea’s
interests, apart from her husband and prospective children, were
scarcely studied. George William was in so complaisant a mood that the
Duke and Duchess of Hanover could ask almost what they liked. He settled
to give his daughter one hundred thousand thalers a year, which meant
that he handed it all over to the exchequer of Hanover. The estates he
had settled on her were also made over, except in the case of certain
unlikely contingencies, such as the death of George Louis before his
wife. If the Princess were left a widow, she was to be entitled to a
dower of twelve thousand thalers a year. But the whole gist of the
settlement was that the Princess, apart from her husband and her
children, had no money of her own and no settlement in the modern sense
of the term. Of course, she would be given enough to maintain herself in
proper state as Princess of Hanover; but her money depended entirely on
the good-will of her husband and what her parents chose to give her from
time to time; she had literally not a penny which she could call her
own. Her position was much that of a married woman in England before the
passing of the Married Woman’s Property Act. The point is important in
view of future developments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account