The Making of a Modern Army and its Operations in the Field: A study based on the experience of three years on the French front (1914-1917)Radiguet, René-Louis-Jules
History
The Making of a Modern Army and its Operations in the Field: A study based on the experience of three years on the French front (1914-1917)
Radiguet, René-Louis-Jules
Armies; Military art and science; World War, 1914-1918
The _Stosstruppen_, obliged, like the ordinary troops, to attack in too
serried ranks, offer a splendid target to artillery and machine-guns
and, nine times out of ten, their rush is stopped before they can
engage in a hand-to-hand fight.
[Illustration: La Bovelle
May 5, 1917--10.30 A.M.]
We wonder what the German divisions on the Russian Front will be able
to accomplish without their best and strongest elements when the
Russian Army rallies and re-enters the war in earnest.
=3. Mission and use of the infantry in a division.= We have stated
that a division includes three or four regiments. We will now dwell on
the disposition of a division comprising two brigades of two regiments
each. It seems certain that this is the type that will be adopted by
the American Army, which possesses a sufficient number of men for this
normal constitution of a division.
_Front of a division._ The front of a division in trench warfare is
very variable in extent. The occupation of strong intrenchments,
enabling the reserves to be sheltered from the enemy’s fire, allows
of the extension of the front, especially if the army remains on the
defensive.
As soon as a division takes the offensive, however, its front is
reduced to such proportions as will permit of energetic effort. The
front of a division in the open field has been fixed at 1800 to 2000
metres. The operations in 1914 showed that the fronts were always
longer than this and often twice as long and such will perhaps
continue to be the case in future if the war in the open is resumed;
but, so long as the war remains one of intrenchments, it will be
very dangerous not to limit the fronts, especially at the time of
an offensive. This is an acknowledged truth, and there is a growing
tendency, especially in the British Army, to shorten the front of
attack of a division.
DISPOSITIONS. The most logical mode of disposing the troops in a
division on the battlefield will always consist in the junction of the
two brigades side by side, and, in the brigades, the junction of the
regiments side by side.
The division, the brigade, the regiment, and even the battalion, have
each to constitute reserves either to ensure success or to guard
against possible failures in their offensive. In this warfare of
position, even more perhaps than in one of movement, the necessity of
always having troops near at hand, ready to repel counter-attacks, is
imperative, owing to the fact that every repulse is followed by the
enemy’s occupation of a part of the line of defence which would have to
be retaken later with great losses should the enemy be given time to
organize themselves therein.
[Illustration: North of La Bovelle
April 24, 1917--10 A.M.]
The disposition of the units in depth enables the Command, when the
lines are cleverly constructed and their intercommunications well
assured, to keep only a few men in the severely bombarded spots, and
to shelter the largest part of the troops where they cannot be injured.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account