“When Shakespeare took Harriette Bowenni as his wife, at once they
began their life-work in earnest. Women then were never recognized
in literary work, and in fact did not ever act upon the stage, their
parts being taken by boys. Harriette knew English history probably
better than any man in England at that time, having studied it for
several years with her father, and written it out for the nobleman. The
first successful plays of Shakespeare were those of English history.
Then followed tragedy and comedy in rapid and startling succession.
Thirty-seven plays are known positively to be Shakespeare’s, all
written in the space of twenty-six years; there being scarcely any
repetition of plot or plan, all sweeping forward in that matchless and
noble diction possessed by no other writer. The source of nearly all
the plots have been well traced. Many of the plays are combinations
of two or three others. In several instances the story is taken pure
and simple from other writers, and the dialogue changed, modified,
interpolated, as if it was necessary to get the play out at a certain
time; yet the work is always nobly done, although many of the plays
show very plainly the work of two persons.
“In every one of these thirty-seven plays William Shakespeare and
Harriette Bowenni worked side by side, she supplying the plot and
historical connection and he the language. The philosophy and by-play
was worked in between them.
“Shakespeare’s conception of womanhood is higher than that of any
other dramatist, even of modern time. Generally we find the saints
and sinners pretty evenly divided between the sexes. Not so with the
Master! His women are wise, gentle and good. Look at Portia, Rosalind,
Cecelia, Viola, Jessica and others. The character of Lady Macbeth was
worked out by Harriette alone, as I will show you in her diary where
she protests against William parsing excellencies in the feminine
gender continually, and she asks leave to portray Lady Macbeth herself
alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account