The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
There can be little doubt that this organization of the Reformed
churches added another element of strife to the contest between the
two religions. The Romish clergy naturally abhorred it, as a sign
of the increasing power and boldness of the Reformed party; while
the statesmen of the day could not but look upon it with suspicion
as a sort of _imperium in imperio_--a dangerous rival to the
civil power, and savoring of rebellion, inasmuch as it ignored the
headship alike of pope and king, acknowledging that of God alone. Men
did not take the trouble to examine closely into the causes of their
dislike: they felt instinctively that such an organization proclaimed
the sovereignty of the people, and that the doctrine might easily be
extended from spiritual to temporal matters. The subsequent history
of the chief Calvinistic churches shows that this instinctive hatred
was not altogether unreasonable. In Switzerland and Holland, in
England and in North America, wherever this organization has been able
to control the political power, a republic has followed. These are
indeed the parts of the world where liberty flourishes most, and for
this noble fruit we may well love the tree that bore it; but in the
sixteenth century, the tendency of society was toward despotism, not
toward self-government; and the statesmen of Europe must be excused
if they were not clear-sighted enough to see that the new movement
must inevitably succeed, or wise enough to become the leaders and
controllers of the popular feelings. And so far it may be doubted
whether Calvin’s influence in France was altogether for good, and
whether the Reformed Church would not have struck deeper root in that
country, if its organization had been less antagonistic. By separating
itself entirely from antiquity, it risked a doubtful good for a certain
evil. As church-government is not a matter of faith but of discipline,
those have much to answer for who array Christians in hostile ranks on
a secondary matter.
The news of this synod and the merciful tendency of the Parliament
inflamed Henry’s orthodoxy to such an extent that he issued an edict
(June, 1559) more terrible even than those which had gone before.
It was dated from Ecouen, a castle belonging to the constable, and
situated about four leagues north of Paris. By that decree all
convicted Lutherans were to be punished with death--instant and without
the chance of remission. It was registered by all the Parliaments
without any limitation or modification whatsoever, and the judges were
forbidden, under severe penalties, to diminish the pains of the edict,
as they had lately been in the habit of doing. Such terrible powers
could scarcely have failed completely to eradicate heresy, if they
had been carried out as Henry II. intended they should be. But there
was a providence watching over France, by which the religionists were
unexpectedly saved from the jaws of the lion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account