The Meaning of Relativity: Four lectures delivered at Princeton University, May, 1921Einstein, Albert
Science
The Meaning of Relativity: Four lectures delivered at Princeton University, May, 1921
Einstein, Albert
Relativity (Physics)
The previous developments are valid however rapidly the
masses which generate the field may move relatively to our chosen
system of quasi-Galilean co-ordinates. But in astronomy
[Pg 93]
we have to do with masses whose velocities, relatively to the
co-ordinate system employed, are always small compared to the
velocity of light, that is, small compared to 1, with our choice
of the unit of time. We therefore get an approximation which is
sufficient for nearly all practical purposes if in (101) we replace
the retarded potential by the ordinary (non-retarded) potential,
and if, for the masses which generate the field, we put
Then we get for and the values
{\qquad}r}>{\quad}r}
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & -\sigma
\end{array}
\right\}.
\qquad \text{(104)}
">
For we get the value , and, finally,
for the values,
{\qquad}c}>{\quad}r}
\dfrac{\sigma}{2} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \dfrac{\sigma}{2} & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \dfrac{\sigma}{2} & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & -\dfrac{\sigma}{2}
\end{array}
\right\}.
\qquad \text{(104a)}
">
We thus get, from (101),
[Pg 94]
while all the other , vanish. The least of these equations,
in connexion with equation (90a), contains Newton's theory of
gravitation. If we replace by we get
We see that the Newtonian gravitation constant , is connected
with the constant that enters into our field equations by the
relation
From the known numerical value of , it therefore follows that
From (101) we see that even in the first approximation the structure
of the gravitational field differs fundamentally from that
which is consistent with the Newtonian theory; this difference
lies in the fact that the gravitational potential has the character
of a tensor and not a scalar. This was not recognized in the past
because only the component , to a first approximation, enters
the equations of motion of material particles.
In order now to be able to judge the behaviour of measuring
rods and clocks from our results, we must observe the following.
According to the principle of equivalence, the metrical relations
of the Euclidean geometry are valid relatively to a Cartesian
system of reference of infinitely small dimensions, and in a suitable
state of motion (freely falling, and without rotation). We
can make the same statement for local systems of co-ordinates
[Pg 95]
which, relatively to these, have small accelerations, and therefore
for such systems of co-ordinates as are at rest relatively to
the one we have selected. For such a local system, we have, for
two neighbouring point events,
where is measured directly by a measuring rod and by
a clock at rest relatively to the system; these are the naturally
measured lengths and times. Since , on the other hand, is
known in terms of the co-ordinates employed in finite regions,
in the form
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account