The Mirror of Taste, and Dramatic Censor, Vol. I, No. 3, March 1810
History
The Mirror of Taste, and Dramatic Censor, Vol. I, No. 3, March 1810
Drama -- Periodicals; Theater -- Periodicals
On this point I hold an opinion diametrically opposite, and hope to
convince the reader that the allegations against the German writers are
entirely groundless. In no German play that I have ever seen is there to
be found any thing of this species. The true character of the German
theatre is the very antipodes to this. Strong bold sentiment--incidents
numerous and interesting--a dramatis personæ of the boldest and most
finished kind--and in fact every thing that can command the most marked
and pointed attention of the reader or spectator. And all this
notwithstanding the disadvantages of appearing in foreign dress; for it
hardly need be stated how wretchedly many of the translations have been
executed.
That many of the German plays are highly exceptionable in their tendency
is equally lamentable as it is undeniable. And when they are adapted for
representation here, they ought to be altered and modified to suit the
taste, the manners, and the state of society in this country. I allude
to the Stranger, Lovers’ Vows, and others of this cast.
But the depravation of taste of which such loud complaints are now made,
and which is so freely charged to the account of the German theatres,
existed on the London stage before any of the German plays were
translated. I have not in my possession at this moment means of deciding
with certainty when the first made its appearance. But from an
examination of a small history of the stage, which now lies before me,
I am inclined to believe that the Stranger was among the earliest of
them, and that its first appearance was in the year 1798. One thing,
however, is absolutely certain, that not one of them was acted previous
to the year 1788: as “Egerton’s Theatrical Remembrancer,” published in
that year, and containing “a _complete list_ of all the dramatic
performances in the English language,” makes no mention of them. If I
prove that this depraved taste existed anterior to 1788, it therefore
finally decides the question.
This, I presume, is tolerably plain and clear. I now proceed to fix a
much earlier origin for those vile slang songs. To O’Keefe they may be
fairly traced. His motley productions contained many of them, and paved
the way for the deluge of them that has since followed; for his
successful example has been too frequently copied since by other
writers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account