These unconscious wishes “suffer the same form of annihilation as
[do] the shades of the lower region in the Odyssey, who awoke to
new life the moment they drank blood.”[62] Shall we then keep them
away from blood? That is not the programme. But for the moment Freud
merely says:[63] “Nothing can be brought to an end in the unconscious;
nothing can cease or be forgotten.” Adding:[64] “I believe that these
unconscious wishes are always active and ready for expression--the as
it were immortal wishes from the unconscious.”
This implies that a wish cannot be deflected, but persists as a desire
for its original object--which is totally contrary to reason and
common sense, to experience, and to physical science. It is the same
as saying that a boy who was looking forward to a Saturday afternoon
visit to his grandmother’s grave and was induced to go to the circus
instead, would--especially if he suppressed his cemeterial inclination
to the point of not telling the fellows about it--straightway forget
everything but the circus, and yet be haunted by an unconscious desire
for the grave. Nor could anything but a conscious visit to the scene of
interment (or to a psycho-analyst) ever set the desire at rest.
Such a suppressed, abashed and forgotten but far-from-done-with desire
is called a “complex.” There are many complexes, but they all reduce
themselves to two, the Œdipus and the Inferiority. Let us pause to
consider them before going on to other suppositions.
3. TWO OFT-THWARTED PASSIONS
An inferiority complex originates in a blow to our self-love, to our
sense of personal regard. And as Dr. McDougall is the most eminent
godfather of this instinct, we had better go to him for a working
example.
A famous architect visits his alma mater after many years of successful
post-graduate life. Suddenly he begins knocking men down right and
left, shouting, and trying to climb over the head of the bed in
spite of the efforts of three attendants to hold him within bounds.
An old-fashioned expert would have pronounced him a paranoic, a
megalomaniac, or something equally disagreeable. But Jung, McDougall’s
one-time co-worker, was called in. He said that it was only a case
of schizophrenia, and that what the patient needed was--not a
straight-jacket but a quiz.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account