The timber bridges developed the steel truss bridge, the typically
American construction, of to-day. In an earlier day the timber bridges
were the glory of the engineer. Sometimes you see one of these old fellows
remaining, like the long structure that Mr. Walcott built across the
Connecticut River at Springfield, Mass., in 1805, and which still does
good service; but the most of them have passed away. Fire has been their
most persistent enemy. Within the past two years fire destroyed the
staunch toll-bridge at Waterford on the Hudson, just above Troy. The
bridge was a faithful carrier for one hundred and four years. In many ways
it was typical of those first constructions. It consisted of four clear
arch spans--one 154 feet, another 161 feet, the third 176 feet, and the
fourth 180 feet in length. It was built of yellow pine, wonderfully hewn
and fitted, hung upon solid pegs; and save for the renewal of some of the
arch footings, the roof, and the side coverings, it was unchanged through
all the years--even though the heavy trolley-cars of a through interurban
line were finally turned upon it.
About the same time, the once-famed Permanent Bridge across the Schuylkill
River at Philadelphia was built. It had two arches of 150 feet each and
one of 195 feet. In its day it was regarded as nothing less than a
triumph. A very old publication says:
"The plan was furnished by Mr. Timothy Palmer, of Newburyport, Mass.,
a self-taught architect. He brought with him five workmen from New
England. They at once evinced superior intelligence and adroitness in
a business which was found to be a peculiar art, acquired by habits
not promptly gained by even good workmen in other branches of framing
in wood.... The frame is a masterly piece of workmanship, combining in
its principles that of king-post and braces or trusses with those of a
stone arch."
In after years, the Permanent Bridge was also entrusted with the carrying
of a railroad. It has, however, disappeared these many years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account