The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
The eternal ground of all existence which every one carries in himself,
Being as it is in itself, and as it is immediately perceived in thinking,
was, accordingly recognised as the sole reality, and all the manifold
changes of the phenomenal world were called Maya, a sham, a delusion, a
mockery of the senses. We see, it is a consistent monism which is taught
in the Upanishads.
I do not intend here either to criticise the Brahman conception of
monism or to contrast it with modern forms of monism. All monisms have
at least one thing in common, viz. they all recognise the paramount
importance of consistency of thought as a basic principle in philosophy.
And to have propounded a monism for the first time is a feat which
cannot be overestimated. What remains of this essay will be devoted to
the investigation of the question, whether this feat is duly or unduly
credited to the Brahmans.
It may first be mentioned, that a few scholars like Weber, Max Müller,
Regnaud, Deussen, and Bhandarkar, pointed out, a long time ago, certain
facts which show that another class of the Hindu nation founded the
monistic doctrine of the old Upanishads. But the attention of the great
public has never been called to this subject, which deserves to be known
by all interested in Indian history.
In the second book of the Brihadâranyaka Upanishad, of which I have
already cited two passages, is found the following story, of which also
the fourth book of Kaushîtaki Upanishad gives a slightly different
version.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account