The Mute Stones Speak: The Story of Archaeology in ItalyMacKendrick, Paul Lachlan
History
The Mute Stones Speak: The Story of Archaeology in Italy
MacKendrick, Paul Lachlan
Italy -- Antiquities
display in the Forum Antiquarium.
In 1907 D. Vaglieri began excavations in the southwest corner of the
Palatine which revealed cuttings in the rock. These were actually,
though Vaglieri did not recognize them as such, cuttings for early
Iron Age huts, the date being an inference from the artifacts, whose
stratification Vaglieri did not record. After a sharp controversy
with Pigorini (whose prestige, because of public interest in the
_terremare_, was then at its height), the dig was suspended, leaving
one but half-excavated. Here, in this intact area, excavations were
resumed in 1948 by a younger specialist in the prehistoric archaeology
of Italy, S. M. Puglisi. This time, the methods were rigorously
scientific, and the cultural strata were observed and recorded with
meticulous care. Puglisi recognized that a scientific dig requires
the constant presence on the site during working hours of a competent
archaeologist; no precise results can ever be obtained by an excavation
director who visits his site only a couple of times a week, since
unsupervised workmen can hardly be expected to respect levels of
stratification, preserve the right artifacts, or keep accurate
excavation notebooks, without which, of course, no scientifically valid
conclusions can be drawn.
In the area left undug by Vaglieri, Puglisi was able to distinguish
five levels, which have been schematically reproduced on the walls
of the Palatine Antiquarium. The top level consisted of nine feet
of ancient dump. But the four levels beneath the dump amounted to
six-and-a-half feet of compact, undisturbed strata, of which the bottom
eight inches represented what had collected on the hut floor while it
was still in use. Here the sherds were very tiny, for they had been
walked on, it being the regular practice of Iron Age man--and woman--to
live comfortably in the midst of their own debris. The hearth (one of
the Dutch ovens was discovered in fragments _in situ_) was near the
center of the hut, very close to a cutting for a central supporting
post--the first evidence ever found for such construction. But there
was no danger of setting the central post on fire, since the cooking
flame was entirely enclosed within the clay of the oven. Bits of fallen
wattle-and-daub revealed the wall-construction. There were animal
bones and impasto sherds bearing the marks of fire, but none of the
shiny black pottery called _bucchero_ (the best examples of which are
rarely found in Rome in contexts earlier than 700 B.C.) and no painted
ware. This level, then, belonged to the first phase of the Iron Age,
dated, by parallels with the finds from beneath the Flavian Palace,
about 800–700 B.C. (The traditional date of Rome’s founding is 753.)
The lowest level being so shallow, and the sherds showing the marks of
fire, the inference is that the hut had not been occupied very long
before it was burned down.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account