The nature of the physical worldEddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Philosophy
The nature of the physical world
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Physics -- Philosophy; Science -- Philosophy
The Four-Dimensional World. I do not know whether you have
been keenly alive to the fact that for some time now we have been
immersed in a four-dimensional world. The fourth dimension required
no introduction; as soon as we began to consider events it was
there. Events obviously have a fourfold order which we can dissect
into right or left, behind or in front, above or below, sooner or
later—or into many alternative sets of fourfold specification. The
fourth dimension is not a difficult conception. It is not difficult to
conceive of events as ordered in four dimensions; it is impossible to
conceive them otherwise. The trouble begins when we continue farther
along this line of thought, because by long custom we have divided
the world of events into three-dimensional sections or instants, and
regarded the piling of the instants as something distinct from a
dimension. That gives us the usual conception of a three-dimensional
world floating in the stream of time. This pampering of a particular
dimension is not entirely without foundation; it is our crude
appreciation of the absolute separation of space-relations and
time-relations by the hour-glass figures. But the crude discrimination
has to be replaced by a more accurate discrimination. The supposed
[Pg 53]
planes of structure represented by Now lines separated one dimension
from the other three; but the cones of structure given by the
hour-glass figures keep the four dimensions firmly pinned together.[3]
We are accustomed to think of a man apart from his duration. When I
portrayed “Myself” in Fig. 2, you were for the moment surprised that I
should include my boyhood and old age. But to think of a man without
his duration is just as abstract as to think of a man without his
inside. Abstractions are useful, and a man without his inside (that
is to say, a surface) is a well-known geometrical conception.
But we ought to realise what is an abstraction and what is not. The
“four-dimensional worms” introduced in this chapter seem to many people
terribly abstract. Not at all; they are unfamiliar conceptions but not
abstract conceptions. It is the section of the worm (the man Now) which
is an abstraction. And as sections may be taken in somewhat different
directions, the abstraction is made differently by different observers
who accordingly attribute different FitzGerald contractions to it. The
non-abstract man enduring through time is the common source from which
the different abstractions are made.
The appearance of a four-dimensional world in this subject is due to
Minkowski. Einstein showed the relativity of the familiar quantities of
physics; Minkowski showed how to recover the absolute by going back to
their four-dimensional origin and searching more deeply.
[Pg 54]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account