West Tennessee along the Mississippi River was a part of the Black Belt,
and was more suitable for the production of cotton than either of the
other two divisions of the state. There were 13,536 slaveholders in
West Tennessee in 1856.[9] West Tennessee had larger slaveholders in
proportion to the total number than either of the other divisions of
the state. In East Tennessee those who owned one slave were one-fourth
of the total number of slaveholders; in Middle Tennessee about the same
proportion prevailed; and in West Tennessee this ratio was reduced to
1:5. In East Tennessee there was only one person owning more than one
hundred slaves; in Middle Tennessee there were twenty-five; in West
Tennessee there were eighty-five.
The plantations in West Tennessee were larger and more numerous, in spite
of the fact that West Tennessee was not settled before 1820. Fayette
County had 74 plantations containing between 500 and 1000 acres each, and
15 containing more than 1000 acres each. Fayette County in 1860 contained
15,473 slaves, all of whom had been acquired since 1830.[10] Shelby had
a slave population of 16,953, which had been acquired since 1830. Some
of the most productive parts of the Black Belt in West Tennessee, such
as Lake County, were not in cultivation by 1860. The counties along the
divide between the Mississippi and Tennessee rivers were very poor, and
therefore not suitable for the production of cotton in large quantities.
Counties like Hardin, Henderson, McNairy, Chester, Decatur, Carroll,
Weakley, and Gibson were cultivated by small farmers, many of whom owned
no slaves at all, while others owned only one or two slaves. In these
counties, farmers worked their crops by themselves, or by the side of
their slaves.
The leading crops of West Tennessee were cotton, corn, wheat, and
tobacco. Cotton was the chief crop, and tobacco was raised in only
the poorer counties, like Benton, Carroll, Weakley, Gibson, Haywood,
and Lauderdale. Fayette and Shelby were the big cotton counties.
West Tennessee produced in 1856 four times as much cotton as Middle
Tennessee, and 3,144 hogsheads of tobacco against 4,511 produced by
Middle Tennessee.[11]
Taking the state as a whole, it was never more than a state of small
farmers. The plantation system as it existed in Mississippi or South
Carolina never prevailed in Tennessee. The soils of Tennessee were not
sufficiently productive to make slavery profitable on a large scale. It
was more profitable to own from one to half a dozen slaves and work with
them than to have an overseer. Of the 33,864 slaveholders in the state in
1850, 26,512 owned less than ten slaves each, and 18,198 owned less than
five each. There were only 22 persons in the state who owned more than
one hundred slaves. By 1856 this number had increased to one hundred and
six.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account