The Neptunian, or Water Theory of Creation — John Shaqi
The Neptunian, or Water Theory of CreationWoodman, J. M.
Religion
The Neptunian, or Water Theory of Creation
Woodman, J. M.
Bible and science; Creation; Religion and science
5. It remains a mystery, how any one knowing anything about geology can
find fault with the order of the Mosaic record. So far as Moses has
mentioned order, it is: moving animals in the sea, air animals, mammals.
The order of science may be more explicit. Substantially it is
protozoans, mollusks, radiates, articulates, vertebrates, mammals. There
is no conflict, nor even deficiency. The term used by Moses is
designedly generic; covering all moving creatures of the waters. The
history of the rocks is in exact accord with the testimony of Moses; and
both verify common observation, viz: each kind of animal produces its
own kind.
6. The poise of the Earth to the sun was such as to give an ice-flow,
whenever for any cause a great subsidence of the hemisphere took place.
The largest happened when the last and highest mountains were raised. As
a consequence, the period called the Drift followed, when the reindeer
made his home in the vicinity of England. Most tropical animals were
destroyed. A new race of placential mammals was to be introduced; the
type of which is found in the sea, able to endure the revolutions of the
Drift. Hence the wisdom displayed in selecting this animal, as a
representative of morning.
7. The Scripture claim of special providence is in harmony with the
defence of the same in science. Providence is general, when wrought out
in due course of law; special, when it is a power added to nature.
Special providence is not a rule of action, but the exception. Science
claims this much in nature. I refer to the admissions of such men as
Huxley, Tyndal and Darwin. Prof. Huxley says: “No scientist of the
present day will venture the affirmation, that matter is eternal. Should
one be found, his brethren would rise up in court, and object to his
testimony, as he would be incompetent to testify.” If not eternal, it
was created by God’s special power. Prof. Darwin says: “Some of our
brethren have tried by experiments, to prove spontaneous life from
inorganic matter, but they have failed, and, from the nature of the
case, they must ever fail.” “There must have been a first life, I think
five forms, I know there must have been one from which life could
proceed.” Special providence again is needed to start life. The same
principle would apply as many times as the earth may have lost its
living forms. Sir Charles Lyell would assure you that the fires of the
Carboniferous period alone deprived the earth of all land and fresh
water animals, plants and seeds, at least one hundred times. Yet it was
supplied between each. Prof. Tyndal says, “Do you ask me 'May inert
matter rise up and live?’ I answer directly, 'No, life must have been
created.’” Here then in science are the Deists’ endorsements of exactly
what every enlightened Christian believes in reference to the covenant
of salvation. This is the doctrine of the science of today, viz: that
“God made all matter at one and the same time; that by special power he
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account