The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular governmentFollett, Mary Parker
Science
The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular government
Follett, Mary Parker
Democracy; Political participation; Social psychology; State, The
As this true purpose evolves itself, loyalty springs into being. Loyalty
is awakened through and by the very process which creates the group. The
same process which organizes the group energizes it. We cannot “will” to
be loyal. Our task is not to “find” causes to awaken our loyalty, but to
live our life fully and loyalty issues. A cause has no part in us or we
in it if we have fortuitously to “find” it.
Thus we see that we do not love the Beloved Community because it is
lovable—the same process which makes it lovable produces our love for
it. Moreover it is not enough to love the Beloved Community, we must
find out how to create it. It is not there for us to accept or reject—it
exists only through us. Loyalty to a collective will which we have not
created and of which we are, therefore, not an integral part, is
slavery. We belong to our community just in so far as we are helping to
make that community; then loyalty follows, then love follows. Loyalty
means the consciousness of oneness, the full realization that we succeed
or fail, live or die, are saved or damned together. The only unity or
community is one we have made of ourselves, by ourselves, for
ourselves.[20]
Thus the social process is one all-inclusive, Self-sufficing process.
The vital impulse which is produced by all the reciprocally interacting
influences of the group is also itself the generating and the vivifying
power. Social unity is not a sterile conception but an active force. It
is a double process—the activity which goes to make the unity and the
activity which flows from the unity. There is no better example of
centripetal and centrifugal force. All the forces which are stored up in
the unity flow forth eternally in activity. We create the common will
and feel the spiritual energy which flows into us from the purpose we
have made, for the purpose which we seek.
-----
Footnote 16:
This does not, however, put us with those biologists who make
conscience a “gregarious instinct” and—would seem to be willing to
keep it there. This is the insidious herd fallacy which crops up
constantly in every kind of place. We may to-day partake largely of
the nature of the herd, our conscience may be to some extent a herd
conscience, but such is not the end of man for it is not the true
nature of man—man does not find his expression in the herd.
Footnote 17:
To a misunderstanding of this point are due some of the fallacies of
the political pluralists (see ch. XXXII).
Footnote 18:
See p. 45.
Footnote 19:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account