The New York Times Current History, A Monthly Magazine: The European War, March 1915Various
History
The New York Times Current History, A Monthly Magazine: The European War, March 1915
Various
World War, 1914-1918
The Italian occupation of the rocky and desolate islet of Saseno
which, from a strategic point of view, completely dominates the sea
approaches to Avlona, is a logical consequence of the occupation of
that town for the purpose of establishing a hospital and maintaining
order. The islet itself was for some months in 1913 and 1914 a bone
of contention between the Italians, who insisted on obtaining it for
the Principality of Albania, and the Greeks, who were equally anxious
to retain it in their own possession. With Saseno under the control of
a foreign power, the possessor of Avlona could never make the town
into a place of arms.
Saseno, as one of the Ionian Islands, became a British protectorate in
virtue of the Treaty of Paris of Nov. 5, 1815, but was given to Greece
by the Treaty of London of March 29, 1864. The Ambassadors' Conference
decided in the Autumn of last year that it was illogical to allow the
chief harbor of Albania to be dominated by the territory of a foreign
power, and by the Protocol of Florence, Dec. 19, 1913, it was
definitely included in Albania. This decision was ratified by
legislative enactment in Greece, to which effect was given by King
Constantine's proclamation of June 13, 1914, shortly after which the
Hellenic garrison was withdrawn. During the Greek regime, the island,
being neutralized by the Treaty of 1864, was quite unimportant, and at
one time the Turks by arrangement with the Hellenic Government,
maintained a lighthouse there.
GREEK TROOPS IN EPIRUS.
[From The Morning Post, London, Oct. 28, 1914.]
ATHENS, Oct. 26.
In view of the continuous Albanian attacks and the growing insecurity
in Northern Epirus the Greek Government today ordered Greek troops to
occupy the districts of Argyrocastro and Premeti. The official
communique just issued declares this to be an entirely provisional
measure to restore order and security in a country already exhausted
by prolonged sanguinary conflicts, and Greece proposes to continue to
adhere to the international arrangements regarding Epirus. It goes
without saying that this reoccupation coincides entirely with public
opinion, which has long been exercised over the sufferings of the
Epirotes.
ASSENT OF THE POWERS.
[From The London Morning Post, Oct. 30, 1914.]
Following are the replies of the great powers (states Reuter's Agency)
to the Greek note announcing the intention of Greece to reoccupy
Epirus:
France declared that she saw no objection to the course proposed by M.
Venizelos's note.
Russia intimated that she would gladly accept whatever decision in the
matter was reached by Great Britain and France.
The British Government accepted M. Venizelos's note.
Germany and Austria-Hungary replied that they accepted the declaration
of the Greek Government that the occupation would not be contrary to
the decisions of the London Conference.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account