The Night Side of LondonRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
History
The Night Side of London
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
We are told that men are grown-up children. This saying forcibly
occurred to me the last time I was in a billiard-room. After I had
recovered from the feeling of suffocation which an atmosphere infected by
gas and smoke had produced, I observed a number of men with long sticks
trying to knock a number of various-coloured balls into any of the six
pockets of the billiard-table. At each unsuccessful attempt a chorus of
observations were made by the players, not remarkable for their novelty,
for the vocabulary of the billiard-room is very limited, such as “Not
within a mile”—“I didn’t play for you, Bob”—“It smelt the hole,” &c. &c.
At each successful attempt the chorus was still more animated, but not
more original, as “Good stroke,”—“Bad flewke”—“On the red,” &c. &c. The
game that was being played was called “pool.” A number of people put
each 2_s._ or 3_s._, as they may choose to arrange it, and they have each
a ball of a different colour—red, blue, pink, yellow, white, brown,
black. Each player has what is called three lives, and each time he is
put in by a player—for they play in turn—he pays sixpence or a shilling,
according to arrangement, and loses a life, whilst the successful player
is allowed to play again upon the ball which happens to be nearest. The
money in the pool is ultimately divided between the two players who have
kept their three lives the longest. It will be seen that, if everything
is straightforward, the best player has the best chance of dividing the
pool or taking the lives. But, unhappily, this game, so child-like in
appearance, is not always innocent. It may happen two players, gifted by
nature with conveniently elastic consciences, and a very confused notion
of right and wrong, may arrange when they play upon each other to
purposely avoid putting the ball in. Of course, each time this omission
is made it is equal to the owner of the ball having an extra life, and of
course makes the division of the pool almost a certainty. Perhaps at the
end of the evening the two gentlemen, “who merely play for their
amusement,” may be seen under a lamppost dividing the spoil. The other
games are pyramids and billiards, which it is unnecessary to describe. I
will simply remark that the best player should win the game; but this is
not always the case. Alas! for human nature! Sharps lose to win; muffs
win to lose (the term “muff” is applied to an indifferent player). After
this not very flattering description the reader would doubtless like to
know who frequent these places. A very large majority are gentlemen—men
who are perfectly incapable of doing anything but what is strictly
honest; the minority are billiard sharks. The gentlemen play because it
is a source of excitement; the sharks, because it is a source of profit.
There are also some who play only for amusement with gentlemen like
themselves, and never risk beyond a shilling or so; and others, mere
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account