The Non-religion of the Future: A Sociological StudyGuyau, Jean-Marie
Religion
The Non-religion of the Future: A Sociological Study
Guyau, Jean-Marie
Irreligion and sociology; Religion; Social sciences
who says: He is.” This Brahma in whom everything vanishes as a dream,
“is a great terror, like a drawn sword”; but he is also the highest
joy to him who has once found him; he is the appeaser of desire and
intelligence. “Those who know him become immortal.”
[Sidenote: Hindu tolerance.]
We have at last reached with Max Müller “the end of the long journey
which we undertook to trace.” We have seen the Hindu religion, which
is typical of human religions, develop gradually, endeavour to cope
with the infinite in its various forms, until it attains the height
of conceiving it as Brahma, the eternal thinker, of whom the world
is no more than a transitory thought. The gods are dead; sacrifices,
rites, observances of all sorts are useless; the sole rite which
is appropriate as an offering to the infinite is meditation and
detachment. Do the débris therefore of the earlier stages of the faith
disappear and the temples fall in dust, and Agni, Indra, and all these
splendid titles pass into oblivion? Not at all, and here, following Max
Müller, we may find in the history of the religions of India a lesson
for ourselves in tolerance and generosity. The Brahmans understood
that, as man grows from infancy to old age, the idea of the divine must
grow in him from the cradle to the grave; a religion which does not
live and grow is a dead religion. The Hindus accordingly have divided
the life of the individual into distinct periods—Âsramas, as they say;
in the earlier Âsramas the believer invokes gods, offers sacrifices,
puts up prayers; it is only later, when he has accomplished these
naïve duties and tempered his soul by long contact with the juvenile
aspects of the faith, that in his mature reason he rises above the
gods, and regards all sacrifices and ceremonies as vain forms, and
thenceforth finds his cult in the highest science which is to him the
highest religion, the Vedanta. Thus in the life of the individual the
various stages of religion exist in an harmonious hierarchy. Even in
our days in a Brahman family one may see the grandfather at the summit
of the intellectual ladder looking down without disdain upon his son,
who fulfils each day his sacred duties, and at his grandson learning
by heart the ancient hymns. All generations live in peace, side by
side. The different castes, each of which follows a system of belief
adapted to its degree, do the same. All adore, at bottom, the same
god, but this god takes care to make himself accessible to everyone,
to stoop for those whose station does not lift them above the earth.
“It is thus,” says Max Müller, “that every religion, if it is a bond
of union between the wise and the foolish, the old and the young, must
be pliant, must be high, and deep, and broad; bearing all things,
believing all things, enduring all things.” Let us be as tolerant as
our fathers in India, let us not be indignant against the superstitions
above which we ourselves have risen and which served us in their day as
stepping stones.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account