The Non-religion of the Future: A Sociological StudyGuyau, Jean-Marie
Religion
The Non-religion of the Future: A Sociological Study
Guyau, Jean-Marie
Irreligion and sociology; Religion; Social sciences
but if so, prayer expires in meditation, in ecstasy, in a monotonous
rocking of the cradle of thought to the rhythm of the phenomenal
world, and religion becomes a religion of monism. But this religion
does not spring in any proper sense from the notion of infinity, it,
so to speak, hooks on to it rather; it is another example of man’s
need, if not to personify, at least to individualize and to unify the
infinite—so great is man’s need to project his individuality by main
force, if need be, into the world! One is bent on endowing this great
material body that one calls nature with some sort of a soul, one is
bent on conceiving it in some fashion or other on the model of the
human organism; and is not that, too, a species of anthropomorphism?
[Sidenote: The conception of infinity a scientific discovery.]
It is only later that human thought, carried away upon an endless
voyage of discovery analogous to the migration of a primitive people,
after having traversed the length of visible space and leaped the
bound of its own intellectual horizon, attains the presence of the
unfathomable ocean of the infinite. The infinite is for the human mind
such a discovery as the ocean was for peoples who had wandered to its
shores from the mountains and the plains. Just as for the newborn child
the different planes of vision are indistinct and equally near; just
as it is by the sense of touch that one learns little by little to
recognize the depth of space and to acquire the conception of distance;
just as, so to speak, it is with one’s own hand that one opens the
horizon before one; in the same way to the uncultivated intelligence
everything seems finite and limited; and it is only by moving forward
that it perceives the breadth and depth of its domain. It is only to
a mind upon the march that the great perspective of the infinite is
thrown open. At bottom this conception of infinity is less due to any
direct experience of mere things than to a sense of one’s own personal
activity, to a belief in the perpetual progress open to human thought;
action, as somebody has said,[17] is the real infinite or at least what
appears as such. In this sense it may be admitted that there is in
every human thought some vague presentiment of infinity, for there is
a consciousness of a fund of activity which will not be exhausted in
any given act nor in any given thought; to be conscious that one lives
is thus in some sort to be conscious that one is infinite: illusion
or reality, this notion forms a part of all our thoughts, turns up in
every proposition of science; but it does not produce science, it is,
on the contrary, born of it; it does not produce religion, which is
the science of primitive ages, but descends from it. The conception
of infinity in many respects resembles the ignorance of Socrates, the
refined ignorance which was really in disguise the last development of
intelligence. One of the antiscientific traits of existing religions is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account