The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization consideredShort, John T. (John Thomas)
History
The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization considered
Short, John T. (John Thomas)
Indians -- Origin; Indians of Mexico -- Antiquities; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
Back of the age of man’s monuments of an architectural character,
beyond the beginning of the first existing shell-heap, and at a time
probably more remote than the first cultivation of maize, it has been
supposed that man occupied the Western Continent as a contemporary with
the mastodon, megalonyx and other extinct animals. Our information
in this department is entirely dependent upon the revelations of
geological science. Unfortunately very little data which may be termed
truly scientific has been brought to light. While considerable seeming
testimony to man’s antiquity on this continent has been produced
from a geologic quarter, still it mostly has been of an unscientific
character. Fossils and human remains are said to have been discovered
in localities and in associations that if the statements of those who
found them could be relied on, would give man an antiquity here as
great as in the valley of the Somme or in the bone caves of Belgium,
France, and England. In the instances alluded to, it is not so often
feared that the veracity of discoverers is doubtful as that their
general lack of acquaintance with the science should make them liable
to error. Where a competent geologist is not present to examine a
fossil _in situ_, and report intelligently upon its position and
surroundings, the case must remain open to suspicion. Unfortunately
for science, this is precisely the weak point in most of the reputed
“finds” which are cited as evidence in this field. In 1848, Count
Pourtales found in Florida, according to Agassiz, a human jaw and
teeth, and bones of the foot, embedded in a calcareous conglomerate
forming a part of a coral reef. This reef, according to Agassiz, may
be 135,000 years old, and the human remains at least ten thousand
years.[105] This statement has been accepted as reliable by Sir Charles
Lyell,[106] Daniel Wilson,[107] and other noted scientific gentlemen.
Count Pourtales, however, makes a statement which materially alters
the case. He says: “The human jaws and other bones found by myself in
Florida in 1848, were not in a coral formation, but in a fresh-water
sandstone on the shore of Lake Monroe, associated with fresh-water
shells or species still living in the lakes (Paulina, Ampullaria,
etc.). No date can be assigned to the formation of that deposit, at
least from present observation.”[108] Human remains were found a number
of years ago embedded in the solid rock in the island of Guadaloupe.
“But more careful investigation proved the rock to be a concretionary
limestone formed from the detritus of corals and shells.”[109] This
rock was ascertained to have been one of very rapid formation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account