London (England) -- History -- 18th century -- Fiction
More he said, because he was one of those tenacious and obstinate
persons who will not take 'No,' for an answer. Besides, as I learned
afterwards, he was most deeply concerned in the success of his mission.
He passed from the stage of entreaty to that of remonstrance and finally
to that of wrath.
'Sir,' he said, 'I perceive that you are one of those crack-brained and
conceited persons who will not allow anyone to do them good: you throw
away every chance that offers, you stand in your own light, you bring
ruin upon your family.'
'Very well,' I said, 'very well indeed.'
'I waste my words upon you.'
'Why then waste more?'
'You are unworthy of the name you bear. You are only fit for the
beggarly trade you follow. Well, Sir, when misery and starvation fall
upon you and yours, remember what you have thrown away.'
I laughed. His cunning face became twisted with passion.
'Sir,' he said, 'all this talk is beside the mark. There are ways. Do
not think that we are without ways and means.' Then he swore a great
round oath. 'We shall find a way, somehow, to bring you to reason.'
'Well Mr. _Integer Vitæ scelerisque Probus_,' I said. 'If you
contemplate rascality you will have to change your motto.'
He smoothed out his face instantly, and repressed the outward signs of
wrath. 'Mr. Will,' he said, 'forgive this burst of honest indignation.
You will do, of course, what you think fit. Sir, I wish you a return to
better sense. I think I may promise you'--he paused and clapped his
forefinger to his nose, 'I am sure that I can so far trespass on the
forbearance of your cousin as to promise that this offer shall be kept
open for three weeks. Any day within the next three weeks you shall find
at my office the paper ready for your signature. After that time the
chance will be gone--gone--gone for ever,' he threw the chance across
the river with a theatrical gesture and walked away.
What did it mean? Why did Matthew want to buy my share? We might both
live for forty years or even more. Neither could touch that money till
the other's death. He might desire my early death in which case all
would be his. But to buy my share--it meant that if I died first he
would have paid a needless sum of money for it: and that if he died
first it would not be in his power to enjoy that wealth. I asked Ramage
on the Sunday why Matthew wanted it. He said that merchants sometimes
desire credit and that perhaps it would strengthen Matthew if it were
known that this great sum of money would be added to his estate whenever
either his cousin or he himself should die. And with this explanation I
must be content. There was another possibility but that I learned
afterwards.
'We will make him sell his reversion.' What was the meaning of those
words? Perhaps they did not apply to me. But I was sure that they did.
Like a woman I was certain that they did: and for a woman's
reason--which is none.
CHAPTER IX
THE CLAIM AND THE ARREST
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account