As reason develops in man, instinct plays a less important part;
whereas a cat chases a mouse, a bird flies, and fish swim by instinct
from their birth to their last day; and the actions of ants, bees, and
moles, do not cease to amaze us, because they are inseparable from
their structure and their vital functions. The natural impulses which
guide birds and insects in making their nests, hives, and storehouses,
cocoons of silk with which they have so enriched our world and theirs,
are the results of constant and repeated acts, during the course of
innumerable generations. The fact of not distinguishing the instinct
which is in man from that found in animals and thus attributing
man’s conscious acts to the natural leanings which guide unconscious
creatures, has perhaps caused Renan to assert that the monotheistic
tendency of the Semitic race belongs to it by a religious instinct.
It is certain that impressions are received both by man and by animals;
with both the knowledge of objects proceeds from the impressions made
on the senses, thus transmitting the image to the intelligence; but
there the likeness ends; the capacities differ. The animal remains the
slave--in every sense of the word--of his organs; the sight of a bone
to gnaw, the corner in which he lies, the signs of friendship that he
receives from human beings, call forth in a dog a chain of feelings
taking the place of the chain of ideas called out in man.
Man’s capabilities of introducing intermediaries between the intention
and the fulfilment of his object witness to his wideness of mind, his
experience of the past and prevision of the future; all those things
that he owes to his power of imagination and conception even in the
case of things having no real existence, or which do not exist as yet;
he reproduces at will the outward likeness of what is not at the moment
before him. Thus man who names an object, _thinks_ it; but the animal
from not possessing language cannot _think_ it and cannot reproduce it
when out of its sight.
The use or non-use of tools creates a great gulf between man and the
brutes. The most intelligent animal, a monkey of a high order, never
uses a tool--even the most primitive--to accomplish his will; no one
can ascribe to the animal creative actions, that is, it does not
fashion an implement that it may attain another end; it has never been
known to carry an object from one spot to another that it might act as
a ladder to bring the animal nearer to the fruit it desired to reach.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account