The study of Sanscrit has shown us that two thousand years ago it
occurred to Hindoo grammarians to investigate the origin of the words
of their language, when they discovered that all words could be reduced
to roots, and that these roots all expressed various forms of activity;
that they were therefore verbs, and that the number of these roots was
very restricted. Our present philologists have continued this work
and are not only able to acknowledge the accuracy of the Brahmanic
discovery, but also to certify that the grammatical analysis of the
Hindoos, put forth 500 years before our era, has never been surpassed.
It is important to remember that roots are the fundamental elements
which permeate the whole organism of the language. Hebrew has been
reduced by Renan and other Hebraists to about 500 roots; the work
has still to be done for the whole Semitic family. The same process
has been carried out with regard to the Aryan languages; we find the
number of roots in Sanscrit reduced to about 800; of Gothic about 600;
rather more than 400 in the Teutonic family, and 600 in the Slavic. The
Ural-Altaic languages have also undergone a partial analysis of the
same kind, and the result at present corresponds to that obtained by
the examination of the other families. After eliminating the tertiary
and secondary roots from the Sanscrit the residuum is 600 or 500,
and we arrive at the fact that this entire language, and, in a great
measure, all the Aryan languages, can be traced back to an extremely
small number of roots.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account