The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
“The Allied diplomats have grasped neither our plan, nor our Pangerman
organization, although that has required a preparation lasting twenty
years. The Allied diplomats have understood neither the true position of
the Balkans after the treaty of Bukarest (though that position was so
favourable to themselves), nor the importance of the Balkan forces for
the issue of the war. Still less do the Allied diplomats and the public
of their respective countries know about the real state of affairs in
Austria-Hungary. In France, and above all in England, a considerable
proportion of the public continue to believe that Austria-Hungary is
chiefly a German country, and that its more or less formal union with the
Empire is a natural and almost inevitable event. Therefore, if we are
compelled to give way in the East and in the West we may still, if we
are clever, have a chance of achieving the third part of our Pangerman
plan. The Allies will not understand the future danger in store for them
if we carry out that part which is, indeed, the principal part of our
scheme, namely, our designs on the South and South-East, symbolized by
the formula: From Hamburg to the Persian Gulf.”
Indeed, the dodge of the “Drawn Game” aims at nothing less than at
that result. We must own that the German argument which has just been
summarized is not devoid of foundation; for up to now the Press of
the Allies has published articles on Austria-Hungary revealing a total
misconception of the facts, and they have thus unconsciously encouraged
the Pangerman project as regards the Hapsburg Monarchy.
[Illustration: THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE DODGE CALLED THE “DRAWN GAME.”]
In the Allied Press, also, the expression: “Drawn Game” is currently
employed to mean that Germany might be considered as vanquished if she
evacuates the now occupied territories in the East and in the West;
but nobody has yet pointed out with the necessary precision that the
so-called “Drawn Game” would not be a draw at all, since it would allow
Germany to effect enormous acquisitions, which would make her much more
powerful than before the war.
And yet the Allies ought not to be again the dupes of a German stratagem;
which, if it succeeded, would involve consequences infinitely more
serious than all the former errors of the Allies. To ward off that danger
it suffices to look it full in the face and thoroughly to fathom what
would be the outcome of a peace negotiated on the so-called principle of
a “Drawn Game.”
The term “Drawn Game” evidently denotes that each country would keep the
frontiers which existed before the war; also that each country would
bear the burden of the outlays it has made during the struggle. But we
will argue on a hypothesis infinitely more favourable for the Western
Allies than that of the so-called “Drawn Game” in order to demonstrate
super-abundantly and as decisively as possible what would be concealed
behind this apparent and partial German capitulation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account