I doubt if there were a billion birds in all the Crooked and Maple
nestings. I am certain that there were not at any one time. I am also
certain that more than double as many young birds left those nestings
than all the birds caught, killed or destroyed. The morning that the
Crooked nesting broke, I was out at daylight, and at the net to see and
help one of my men make a strike; for an hour and a half a continuous
body of birds half a mile wide and very thick was going out; our strike
was twenty-nine dozen, twenty-five dozen young and four dozen old,
about the same proportion as the other catchers. This showed that of
the immense body over five-sixths were young birds, barely old enough
ones remaining to guide the body of young, and this was out of the
nesting from which the bulk of the birds had been caught, where the
destruction had been the greatest. When it is considered that the
Manistee birds hatched three times unmolested, that there was a body
several times larger there, than at the Crooked and Maple, and that
many from each body went further north entirely out of reach and nested
at least once, possibly twice again, some idea may be formed of the
immense addition to the army of pigeons from the Michigan nestings of
1878. Many more young birds left the Crooked River nesting alone, than
all, old or young, destroyed during the entire season's pigeoning.
Prof. Roney's lament about the young dying when deprived of the parent
bird, and his addition to the number "sacrificed to Mammon" from that
source, compares favorably with the poisoned berry story, or the attack
on Turner. Admitting that 1,500,000 birds were caught and killed, not
more than half of these would be old birds, some of which would not be
nesting, and from some of which the young had left the nest. If for
every one of the 750,000 old birds caught and killed, the squab had
died, this would make a total slaughter of 2,250,000, or about one four
hundred and fiftieth of the number he says.
I don't believe Prof. Roney knows what a billion is. However, there
were not 750,000, no, nor 100,000 squabs killed by losing their
parents. It is a well-proved fact that the old bird coming in will stop
and feed any squab heard crying for food, that in this way they look
out for one another's young, and the orphans or half-orphans are cared
for. It is rare, however, for both old birds to be caught or killed,
since the toms and hens when nesting always fly separately, and the
chance of both the parents of the squab falling a "victim to Mammon,"
particularly in a large nesting, is small. As proof of the pigeons
feeding squabs indiscriminately, I may mention that one of the men in
my employ this year, at the Shelby nesting in 1876, in one afternoon
shot and killed six hen pigeons that came to _feed_ the _one squab_ in
the _same nest_.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account