The pedigree of fascism : $b A popular essay on the Western philosophy of politicsLion, Aline
Philosophy
The pedigree of fascism : $b A popular essay on the Western philosophy of politics
Lion, Aline
Italy -- Politics and government -- 1914-1945; Partito nazionale fascista (Italy); Political science; State, The
Machiavelli was obviously too much a man of his age to be able to
surpass the theory of man as an individual attempting to realise his
personality in a world in which he could expand as freely as possible.
He could not conceive the objectivity and consequent importance of the
State as moral reality, and still less the intimate subjectivity of the
objective world in which man realises his will. The very word “Fortune”
kept to indicate actuality was misleading, and veiled his real notion
of freedom; he severed liberty from law and by only retaining the
former he gave the careless or ignorant an opportunity for the vulgar
interpretation of his doctrines.
Time and the works of Bruno and Campanella, stripped of their heretical
outlook, were to further in the mind of Vico the first maturity of the
fruits of which the seed was to be found in the Florentine statesman’s
ideas of “virtue” and political morality. Thus, while the other
modern nations were necessarily getting more deeply embogged in their
anti-historical attitude towards life, Italy, in the political idleness
of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, was slowly elaborating
those doctrines that may yet prove to be the ballast needed by all
countries to weather the present political and social storms.
CHAPTER III
THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY IN ENGLAND AND ITALY
The contribution of England to the history of the world during the
seventeenth century is so considerable that the very attempt to sketch
it is almost an impertinence. It cannot be reduced into schematic
lines, for there never was a richer synthesis of life. Never have
religion, art, and philosophy pervaded the whole life of a people as
they did in England at the end of the sixteenth and during all the
seventeenth century. Very highly refined periods do not produce great
arts and it must be said that with very few exceptions the creative
generations are bound to be rather trivial. Strong minds, deep
religious feelings, the virile consciousness of personal efficiency,
do not make for tolerance and refinement in practical life; but they
yield a philosophical, an artistic, a political harvest on which their
progeny continue to live for centuries, elaborating and refining
until tolerance is the order of the day in philosophical, religious
and political matters, whilst dilettantism and criticism flourish,
preparing the way for new generations of creative men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account