The pedigree of fascism : $b A popular essay on the Western philosophy of politicsLion, Aline
Philosophy
The pedigree of fascism : $b A popular essay on the Western philosophy of politics
Lion, Aline
Italy -- Politics and government -- 1914-1945; Partito nazionale fascista (Italy); Political science; State, The
According to Grotius such _jus naturale_—the only branch of legal
studies that can be treated is philosophy—is based on the essence of
the nature of men. But such nature is the same all over the world
just as Nature is. It will be the same for ever in spite of historical
oscillations just as Nature will. The presupposition of this nature
of man, postulated out of and against every experience, is a negation
of history as the process of the gradual development of mankind. Yet
unquestionably its introduction in modern politics was the cause of a
great progress towards justice, and in Grotius himself it is balanced
by his insistence on not taking positive law out of history. The
lack of good metaphysical ground brought him to the postulation of
an unhistorical reality whilst the recent improvement of historical
researches at the hands of Jean Bodin and others induced him not to
consider positive laws except in the light of history. To be fair, this
instinct of society deeply inset in the nature of man was not of his
own invention. It is to be found in Aristotle. It is to be found in
St. Thomas. But then the instinct compelling man to live in community
is understood in a very different way by the Greek philosopher, by
the great Scholastic doctor and by the Dutch statesman. For if it is
true that historical facts which are political, artistic, military,
receive their definite character from the ideas of the generation
that achieved them, it is equally true that the meaning attached to
traditional ideas by any one man is to a certain extent modified by the
whole life of his generation. So that Aristotle understands by Nature
the transcendental power which planned the life of man as a part of its
universal scheme; Thomas Aquinas sees in the nature of man that which
was determined as characteristic of mankind by the Divine will; whilst
Grotius sees in this sense of society something very much like the law
of gravitation—not quite, however, since in him we see looming out
already the ghost of man anterior to society, of whom nobody ever heard
anything and which is, therefore, a pure conjecture. Considering this
nature of mankind as his basis, it was inevitable that Grotius should
think the best constitution of the state to be one the origin of which
made it more likely to meet the requirements of such nature. Once the
filiation of law as the product of this nature of man was established,
private and public law obviously derived from the _jus naturale_, and
the state must originate from an agreement of its components.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account