The majority of mathematicians have followed Schoenflies rather than
Poincaré, and have thus adopted tactics rather like those of the March
Hare and the Gryphon,[110] who promptly changed the subject when Alice
raised awkward questions. Indeed, the process of the first of these
creatures of a child's dream is rather preferable to that of
Schoenflies. The March Hare refused to discuss the subject because he
was bored when difficulties arose. Schoenflies would not say that he was
bored--he professed interest in philosophical matters, but simply called
the logical continuation of a subject by another name when he did not
wish to discuss the continuation, and thus implied that he had discussed
the whole subject. Further, Schoenflies would not apparently admit that
the one method of logic could be applied to the solution of both
mathematical and philosophical problems, in so far as these problems are
soluble at all; but the March Hare, shortly before the remark we have
just quoted, rightly showed great astonishment that butter did not help
to cure both hunger and watches that would not go.[111] The judgment of
Schoenflies by which certain apparently mathematical questions were
condemned as "philosophical," rested on grounds as flimsy as those in
the Dreyfus Case, or the Trial in _Wonderland_.[112]
FOOTNOTES:
[98] Chapters VII and XXXVI.
[99] _Die Entwickelung der Lehre von den Punktmannigfaltigkeiten._
Bericht, erstattet der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, Leipzig,
1908.
[100] _Ibid._, p. 7. The battle-cry is: "_Gegen jede Resignation, aber
auch gegen jede Scholastik!_"
[101] "Ueber die Stellung der Definition in der Axiomatik," _Jahresber,
der deutsch. Math.-Ver._, vol. xx., 1911, pp. 222-5. The battle-cry is
on p. 256 and is: "Für den Cantorismus aber gegen den Russellismus!"
[102] _Ibid._, p. 251. "Es ist also," he exclaims with the eloquence of
emotion and the emotion of eloquence, "nicht die Geringschätzung der
Philosophie, die mich dabei treibt, sondern die Liebe zur
Mathematik;..."
[103] "Ueber die Stellung der Definition in der Axiomatik," _Jahresber,
der deutsch. Math.-Ver._, vol. xx., 1911, p. 251.
[104] [Cf. for this, _M._, vol. xxii., January 1912, pp. 149-58.--ED.]
[105] _Bericht_, 1908, p. 76, note; cf. p. 72.
[106] E.g. in F. Hausdorff's review of Russell's _Principles_ of 1903 in
the _Vierteljahrsschr. für wiss. Philos. und Soziologie_.
[107] [Cf. _M._, vol. xxv., 1915, pp. 333-8.--ED.]
[108] Russell, _A. J. M._, vol. xxx., 1908, p. 226.
[109] _Loc. cit._, p. 222.
[110] See Appendix Q.
[111] See Appendix R.
[112] See Appendix S.
CHAPTER XXXVIII
MODERN LOGIC AND SOME PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account