The Piccadilly Puzzle: A Mysterious StoryHume, Fergus
Philosophy
The Piccadilly Puzzle: A Mysterious Story
Hume, Fergus
Detective and mystery stories; Piccadilly (London, England) -- Fiction
"At all events," he said to himself, as he wended his way back to his
hotel, "I've found out one thing--Lena Sarschine and Lady Balscombe
were sisters, and both loved the same man. What I'd like to know is,
whether Lady Balscombe killed her sister out of jealousy. D--n it, I'm
getting more perplexed than ever. This visit instead of clearing up
the mystery deepens it. I think I'll see Sir Rupert Balscombe and ask
him about things; as his wife is mixed up in it, I've a right, and I'd
give anything to save that young fellow's life, because I'm sure he's
innocent."
CHAPTER XIII.
MYLES DESMOND FINDS FRIENDS.
Myles Desmond was not a particularly good young man, but good enough
as young men of the present generation go. He was a healthy, cheery,
enough-for-the-day-is-the-evil-thereof sort of fellow, and, considered
himself decidedly hardly treated at being arrested on such a serious
charge as that of the murder of Lena Sarschine.
According to the cynical creed prevailing now-a-days all his friends
should have turned their backs on him now he was in trouble, but there
is a wonderful lot of undiscovered good even in friends, and none of
them did. Instead of calling him names and laughing at his misfortune
Desmond's friends took up his cause warmly, and both in clubs and
drawing-rooms he was heartily commiserated. Many people, both in his
own set and in the literary circle of which he had become a member,
had taken a liking to the bright, kindly young man, and emphatically
declared that the whole thing was a terrible mistake.
"Myles Desmond a murderer!" they said, "why as soon say the Archbishop
of Canterbury is an Atheist." So as certain grasses only give out
perfume when crushed, Myles' misfortune brought all his friends around
to help him if need be.
And he sadly needed help, poor fellow, for his position was a very
critical one, the evidence against him being as follows:
1. He had last seen Lena Sarschine alive on the night of the murder.
2. He had been met in St. James's Street by Ellersby not far from the
scene of the crime.
3. He had in his possession the dagger with which the crime was, to
all appearances, committed.
Myles answered these accusations as follows:
1. He had not seen Lena Sarschine on that night, but another lady
whose name he refused to divulge.
2. His presence in St. James's Street on the night in question was
purely accidental.
3. And the dagger found in the vase was one he had taken from Lena
Sarschine on the afternoon of the day she had called to see Calliston
about the elopement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account