The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
The best opportunity for this policy was immediately after the
conference at Doncaster, as from 9 December until the beginning of
January, in spite of some grumbling and rioting, the north was fairly
quiet in the expectation of the Duke’s coming. But the departure of the
gentlemen who travelled south to sue their pardons alarmed the commons
and caused rumours and threats of a new rising[138].
On Friday 15 December Henry made his most skilful move. Peter Mewtas, a
gentleman of the Privy Chamber, was despatched to Robert Aske, with a
letter from the King. Henry wrote that, as he had granted a free pardon
to Aske, he had conceived a great desire to speak with him, and
therefore summoned him to come up to court, where he trusted that by
frankness Aske would deserve reward. A safe-conduct was enclosed, from
the date until Twelfth Day, 6 January 1536–7. Aske was instructed not to
inform anyone of the summons[139]. The King’s object in enjoining that
the visit to court must be secret was to inspire the other leaders of
rebellion with fear and suspicion of Aske. If he disappeared from the
north and was next heard of in London, everyone would conclude that he
had gone up to turn King’s evidence. His credit would be destroyed, and
the other gentlemen, trembling for their lives, might be induced to turn
traitors in fact. Simple-minded as he was, Aske was not quite so foolish
as to fall into this trap. He had been living in his old home at Aughton
since the conference at Doncaster[140], and did not receive the King’s
messenger until after 18 December[141], for travelling must have been
slow in that bitter winter. When the letter arrived Aske sent his
brother-in-law William Monketon to Lord Darcy with a copy of it, and a
message that he intended to go, and that he begged Darcy to keep the
country in order while he was away. After despatching the messenger he
set out for London, accompanied by six servants, without waiting for an
answer from Darcy. When Aske returned to the North, Monketon told him
that Darcy said “he did well to venture, seeing that he had the King’s
letter therefor.”[142] Darcy was afterwards accused of having counselled
Aske to take six servants and to leave one at Lincoln, another at
Huntingdon, another at Ware, and to lodge the rest in different parts of
London, so that if the King attempted any treachery they might bring
back news to Darcy, who would come to his rescue[143]. Aske never
received any such message[144], and the story in its elaborated form
must be untrue[145], but it sounds as if it might have had some
foundation in Darcy’s impetuous form of humour. If Monketon hinted that
he feared Aske was really on his way to the Tower, Darcy may have
exclaimed, “If he is in any doubt, let him lay posts along the road to
bring me early news, and I will come and fetch him out myself,”—or words
to that effect. He might easily make a hasty remark of that nature,
without the smallest idea that anyone would take it seriously, but
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account