The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
Henry, like all despots, was extremely suspicious of a joke. Without any
such precautions, therefore, Aske rode up to London about Christmas
time.
Henry summoned Sir Thomas Wharton to court, but he excused himself[146].
Bishop Tunstall, who was still at Norham, was also summoned. The letter,
despatched on 24 December, did not reach him until 4 January, and he
replied that he dared not attempt the journey through the disaffected
region[147]. Sir George Darcy and Sir Nicholas Fairfax went up on their
own account at Christmas, the former carrying messages from the Earl of
Northumberland[148]. Archdeacon Magnus, who had been with Archbishop Lee
since the beginning of the rising, went to the Earl of Shrewsbury and
thence to London as early as 13 December[149]. Sir Oswald Wolsthrope and
Sir Ralph Ellerker had gone up to London, as well as Sir Ralph Evers,
who held Scarborough so long[150]; Lord Latimer set out, but was turned
back by an order from the King[151].
The news that so many had gone up to court gave rise to rumours. The
commons said that the only object of the conference at Doncaster and the
“counselling above” was to betray them, and that they would trust the
gentlemen no more[152]. This was the result which the King wished to
obtain, and he took no trouble to conciliate the lower ranks of the
Pilgrims.
His Council had determined that a mass of treasure must be accumulated.
To achieve this, the King’s rents and taxes must be collected[153]. The
collection was not contrary to the agreement at Doncaster. The gentlemen
had declared there, perhaps over hastily, that the King’s money was
ready for his Highness[154]. But considering the state of the country it
would have been wiser to defer the collection for a time, if the King’s
object had really been peace. The servants of John Gostwick, the
treasurer of the tenths and first fruits, went north to collect the
King’s rents immediately after the conference at Doncaster[155]. They
were accompanied by Sir George Lawson the treasurer of Berwick, who had
himself been involved in the rebellion[156]. At Templehurst, Doncaster,
Wakefield, and Sheriffhutton the rents were paid quietly, but as the
King’s servants went further north they began to encounter
opposition[157]. On Christmas Eve Lawson reported to Gostwick from
Barnard Castle that it was impossible to induce anyone to pay at present
in those parts. They all said that they had been ruined by the late
disturbances. At Barnard Castle the tenants had demanded respite until
twenty days after Christmas, and at Bishop Middleham until a week before
Candlemas (2 February), and he could make no better terms. He himself
and some other friends were advancing the money to pay the garrison at
Berwick, whither he was going, while Gostwick’s servants were returning
to Lawson’s house at York to wait until the appointed time for the new
collection[158]. One of the servants, Thomas Ley, wrote to Gostwick from
York, confirming Lawson’s report.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account