In Totemism we find represented not one idea, but an aggregation of most
of the fundamental ideas of mankind. This is why the attempt to trace it
to one particular root has failed to dispose of the question of its
origin in a final and satisfactory manner. For a time there seemed to be
a general disposition to accept what is called the “Nickname theory” by
which Totemism was attributed to the custom of giving animal nicknames.
We have a peasant called Nedrott (in the Brescian dialect “duck”); I
myself never heard his real name—his wife is “la Nedrott” and his
children are “i Nedrotti.” It is alleged that his father or grandfather
had flat feet. But I never heard of a confusion between the Nedrotti and
their nicknamesakes. It may be said that this would be sure to happen
were they less civilised. How can we be sure that it would be sure to
happen? An eminent scholar who objects to the nickname theory on the
ground that it assigns too much importance to “verbal misunderstanding,”
proposes as an alternative the “impregnation theory.” A woman, on
becoming aware of approaching motherhood, mentally connects the future
offspring with an animal or plant which happens to catch her eye at that
moment. This is conceivable, given the peculiar notions of some savages
on generation, but if all Totemism sprang from such a cause, is it not
strange that in Australia there are only two Totems, the eagle-hawk and
crow?
As a mere outward fact, the Totem is what its name implies, a badge or
sign; just as the wolf was the badge of Rome, or as the lion is taken to
represent the British Empire. The convenience of adopting a common badge
or sign may have appeared to men almost as soon as they settled into
separate clans or communities. Besides public Totems there exist private
and secret Totems, and this suggests that the earliest communities may
have consisted of a sort of freemasonry, a league of mutual help of the
nature of a secret society. Around the outward and so to speak heraldic
fact of Totemism are gathered the impressions and beliefs which make it
a rule of life, a morality and a religion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account