As _Prunus americana_ is more carefully studied throughout the great
territory it inhabits, undoubtedly one or more sub-species will be
described. The plums of this species in the Mississippi Valley are
distinguished from the eastern and typical form by fruits having a length
greater than the diameter, by a somewhat different aspect of tree and by
flatter seeds which are usually conspicuously longer than broad. All of
the cultivated varieties come from the western form. The plant of _Prunus
americana_ in the dry plain regions in Kansas and Nebraska becomes
shrubby in character while on the alluvial bottom lands along the streams
in this region it retains the character of a tree. In the southern limit
of its range, the leaves of this species are more or less pubescent on
the lower surface. As the species occurs throughout western New Mexico,
Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Montana and Manitoba, it differs enough,
possibly, from the eastern types to be considered a sub-species, having
a wholly different aspect of tree, silvery and somewhat scurfy twigs,
smaller, thinner and lighter colored leaves and smaller fruits with more
roundish stones.
_Prunus americana_ is the predominating native plum. It is the most
widely distributed, is most abundant in individual specimens and has
yielded the largest number of horticultural varieties of any of the
native species. Because of its prominence and comparatively high degree
of permanency of characters it may well be considered the type from
which has sprung not only its botanical varieties but several other of
the American species. Its variability, too, is shown in its many diverse
horticultural varieties, and of its adaptability it may be said that
it flourishes on nearly all soils and exposures, and is found wild or
cultivated from Maine to Florida and northward from Mexico along the
eastern slope of the Rocky Mountains well into Canada. The species was
well named by Marshall “Americana.”
This plum has not played nearly as important a part in the pomology of
America as its merits would warrant. It seems to have made an impression
almost from the first upon the Europeans who settled America, for it is
mentioned in nearly all the early records of the food products of the
newly found land, yet its cultivation can hardly be said to have begun
until the last half of the Nineteenth Century. But the early descriptions
of this and other native plums by the colonial explorers, naturalists
and botanists, show but little interest in these fruits as subjects for
cultivation, and seem to contain almost no prophecies as to the possible
development of a new orchard plant from them. It is probable that the
Damsons, which were early introduced in America, and the Domesticas,
which came at least before the Revolution, proved so adaptable to the
part of the New World in which the colonies were planted that this, even
though the best of the wild plums, offered small reward in comparison.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account