The Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys) of Utah: University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, Vol. 1 No. 1Durrant, Stephen David
Science
The Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys) of Utah: University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, Vol. 1 No. 1
Durrant, Stephen David
Pocket gophers -- Utah
_Diagnosis._--Size medium (see measurements). Color: Upper parts and
sides Pinkish Buff, purest on sides; underparts Pale Pinkish Cinnamon;
inguinal and pectoral regions Pale Pinkish Buff; nearly all specimens
have white on perineal region; nose grayish black; front feet, hind
feet and distal third to half of tail white; postauricular patches
black. Skull: Braincase moderately convex on dorsal surface; rostrum
strongly depressed, giving the entire dorsal surface of the skull a
"rocker-shape"; zygomatic arches heavy, short and widely spreading,
widest posteriorly; upper incisors recurved, short and wide; molariform
teeth large; alveolar length of upper molar series long; palatal pits
deep; tympanic bullae moderately inflated ventrally; mastoidal breadth
actually as well as relatively wide.
_Comparisons._--Compared with topotypes of _Thomomys bottae
wahwahensis_, _convexus_ is of approximately the same color, but
differs as follows: Size smaller; tail, hind foot, and ear shorter.
Skull: Rostrum longer, narrower and more depressed; skull convex rather
than flat; nasals longer, and convex rather than flat; tympanic bullae
larger; zygomatic arches shorter and more massive; molariform teeth
larger.
From topotypes of _Thomomys bottae centralis_, _convexus_ differs in:
Size smaller; tail and hind foot shorter. Color: Uniformly lighter,
more white in perineal region. Skull: Smaller, more convex; rostrum
shorter, wider and more depressed; zygomatic arches shorter and
heavier; mastoidal breadth actually, as well as relatively wider;
tympanic bullae more inflated ventrally; upper incisors shorter and
wider.
Comparatively, topotypes of _convexus_ can be distinguished from those
of _Thomomys bottae aureiventris_ by: Size smaller; tail and hind foot
shorter. Color: Darker on upper parts; no "gold" on underparts. Skull:
Smaller and more nearly flat; rostrum shorter and more depressed;
zygomatic arches shorter, heavier and widest posteriorly rather than
anteriorly; interpterygoid space V-shaped as opposed to lyre-shaped;
upper incisors shorter, narrower and more recurved.
Topotypical specimens of _convexus_ differ from those of _Thomomys
bottae nesophilus_ as follows: Size smaller; tail and hind foot
shorter. Color: Uniformly lighter throughout, Cinnamon Buff as opposed
to Pinkish Buff. Skull: Smaller; rostrum heavier, shorter and more
depressed; zygomatic arches shorter, heavier and not so widely
spreading; no widening of supraoccipital as in _nesophilus_; upper
incisors shorter and more recurved.
When compared with topotypes of _Thomomys bottae albicaudatus_,
_convexus_ shows the following differences: Size smaller; tail and
hind foot shorter. Color: Markedly lighter throughout. Skull: Smaller,
more convex and compact; rostrum shorter, heavier, more depressed and
compact; zygomatic arches shorter and more robust; upper incisors
shorter and more recurved.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account