Again in the _Letters_ not found in _D_, _H49_, _Lec_ there is a close but not invariable agreement between the text of _1633_ and that of this group of manuscripts. Those letters, which follow that _To Sir Edward Herbert_, are printed in _1633_ in the same order as in this edition (pp. 195-226), except that the group of short letters beginning at p. 203 ('All haile sweete Poet') is here amplified and rearranged from _W_. Now in _A18_, _N_, _TC_ these letters are also brought together (_N_, _TCD_ adding some which are not in _A18_, _TCC_), and the special group referred to, of letters to intimate friends, are arranged in exactly the same order as in _1633_; have the same headings, the same omissions, and the same accidental linking of two poems. In the other letters, to the Countesses of Bedford, Huntingdon, Salisbury, &c., the textual notes will show some striking resemblances between the edition and the manuscripts. In the difficult letter, 'T'have written then' (p. 195), _1633_ follows _N_, _TCD_ where _O'F_ gives a different and in some details more correct text. In 'This twilight of two yeares' (p. 198) the strange reading of l. 35, 'a prayer prayes,' is obviously due to _N_, _TCD_, where 'a praiser prayes' has accidentally but explicably been written 'a prayer praise'. In the letter _To the Countesse of Huntingdon_ (p. 201) the _1633_ version of ll. 25, 26 is a correct rendering of what _N_, _TCD_ give wrongly: Shee guilded us, But you are Gold; and shee Vs inform'd, but transubstantiates you. On the other hand there are some differences, as e.g. in the placing of ll. 40-2 in 'Honour is so sublime' (p. 218), which make it impossible to affirm that these poems were taken direct from this group of manuscripts as we know them, without alteration or emendation. The _Progresse of the Soule_ or _Metempsychosis_, as printed in _1633_, must have been taken in the first instance from this manuscript. In both the manuscripts and the edition, at l. 83 of the poem a blank space is left after 'did'; in both, l. 137 reads, 'To see the Prince, and soe fill'd the waye'; in both, 'kinde' is substituted for 'kindle' at l. 150; in l. 180 the 'uncloth'd child' of 1633 is explicable as an emendation of the 'encloth'd' of _A18_, _N_, _TC_; and similarly the 'leagues o'rpast', l. 296 of _1633_, is probably due to the omission of 'many' before 'leagues' in _A18_, _N_, _TC_--'o'rpast' supplies the lost foot. It is clear, however, from a comparison of different copies that as _1633_ passed through the press this poem underwent considerable correction and alteration; and in its final printed form there are errors which I have been enabled to correct from _G_.