The Political Institutions of the Ancient GreeksHammond, Basil Edward
History
The Political Institutions of the Ancient Greeks
Hammond, Basil Edward
Greece -- Politics and government; Political science
We may now sum up the results of our observations of the Spartans and
their institutions. From the earliest times they devoted themselves to
acquiring and cultivating those qualities which would enable them to
excel as a people of conquerors and of slave-owners: but in doing this
they lost most of the other virtues, and especially the qualities which
make intelligent citizens. There were few political questions in which
the Spartans took any interest: they did not make new laws; they had no
commerce, no gold or silver except in the treasury of the state: the
only subjects debated in their assemblies were questions of war, peace,
alliances, disputed successions to the throne, and the like: so that
the assembly did not meet save when such questions arose, or when one
of the annual elections of Ephors came round. They did not even care
what men were set over them as rulers: their method of electing Ephors
was childish, and the elections are generally if not always passed over
in silence by the historians. Nor is their indifference surprising:
for their real ruler was, not the Ephors nor any living men, but
their rigid system of custom and discipline: and under that system it
mattered little which of them was in command and which had to obey,
since nearly every Spartan was competent to issue such orders as custom
and usage dictated, and every other Spartan was prepared to obey them.
If this estimate is a just one, it follows that the really important
part of the Spartan institutions was not the political part but the
disciplinary: that their discipline destroyed their capacity for
political activity: that the Spartans from the age of Theopompus till
the Peloponnesian war were rather a military order than a political
body: and that they and their institutions cannot be very interesting
or instructive to students of Politics, except as showing how a
community, which was originally political, may lose the characteristics
by which political communities are distinguished.
After the Peloponnesian war the Spartans got access to rich spoil at a
distance from their own country and began to think less of their common
interests as slave-owners at home, than of their individual hopes of
plundering the inhabitants of the cities of Asia Minor. In consequence
many of the Helots were emancipated to serve as soldiers in foreign
war, and the intensity of the oppression of the rest was probably
diminished: while on the other hand each individual Spartan acted no
longer for the common good of the Spartiatæ but for the sole good of
himself, and the government was conducted in the interest not of the
whole ruling caste but of that smaller number among them who had been
successful in enriching themselves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account