The Potter and the ClayWinnington Ingram, Arthur F. (Arthur Foley)
Religion
The Potter and the Clay
Winnington Ingram, Arthur F. (Arthur Foley)
Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English -- 20th century; World War, 1914-1918 -- Sermons
(3) Then, thirdly, to carry out this great task we must know our
people one by one. Here is a great difficulty. A parish priest may
have ten thousand people in his charge, but how difficult it is
for him to know each one! He must do it--though, of course, partly
through others. He must have a system. I do not think a parish
priest ought ever to be wholly inaccessible to any part of his
parish. He must have his curates working for him, but the priests
who work with him must have a system by which the vicar himself will
know when he is wanted. I am sure every parish priest feels that
he must be ready for any emergency. It is not easy to escape from
councils and committees, but he should be ready with the surgeon's
knife whenever he is wanted all over his great ward. He must not
leave it wholly to anyone else, so long as he is responsible. In
order to know the people, he must be up to the last day of his
life a visitor. I hold it to be an absolutely wrong view of the
pastoral office to say: "I can sit in my cassock in the church, and
the people know where I am, and they can come to me if they like."
Of course, it is a very good thing to have times when we shall be
in church, and when the people will know that we are there. There
is (let us say) the daily service at a time which everybody knows;
they can catch us after the daily service, and see us as we go away.
We make it known we shall be pleased to see them after Mattins and
Evensong. And we have a time before the great festivals when they
can come to prepare themselves for the great services. All that
is wholly to the good. It is good for the house-surgeon to have a
place where his patients can come and see him. But something else is
wanted. He must be ready to go out and see them when they are ill,
and find out what is the matter with them. What should we think of a
physician who had always the same regimen and the same medicine for
everybody? It used to be a joke, I remember, at a great school at
which I was, that the doctor gave us all the same physic. It was no
doubt a libel on him. But certainly such a method would be a fault
in the case of the spiritual surgeon; souls would die under such
treatment. We have to ask ourselves: Are there any patients dying
under my hand, in my ward, because I have not taken the trouble to
really heal them, because I am not going down deep enough, because
I am not finding out what is the matter with them, because I am not
really acting the part of physician, still less that of a celestial
surgeon?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account