The Psychology of the EmotionsRibot, Th. (Théodule)
Science
The Psychology of the Emotions
Ribot, Th. (Théodule)
Emotions
In recent times it has been maintained that pleasure, as well as
grief, ought to be regarded as a _sensation_, not as the concomitant
of various psychic states; that both are fundamental senses having
their own proper nervous energies distinct from other sensations. In
other words, the expression, “sensations of pleasure and pain,”
ought to be taken in the strict sense borne by the word sensation. I
have already touched on this point in treating of pain, but it may
not be out of place to return to it here; for, apart from its
hypothetical character, I cannot think this assertion a happy one.
In fact, if there is any psychological state clearly delimited and
differentiated from all others, it is sensation.
Sensation is determined and circumscribed by a special organ serving
for this purpose only, as in the case of sight, hearing, etc., or at
least by special nerves and special peripheral terminations, as in
the case of touch, and temperature. Internal sensations, in spite of
the nervous apparatus proper to them, have a vaguer character; hence
some psychologists call them indifferently sensations or feelings.
The kinæsthetic sensations, or those of movement, long included
under the designation of muscular sense (an improper term, gradually
falling out of use), have, though diffused through the organism,
nerves peculiar to themselves; those of the muscular tissue, the
articulations (the periosteum, the ligaments, the synovial
membranes, the tendons). But pleasure and pain have neither special
nerves nor special organs. We have seen the opinion admitted with
regard to the pain-bringing nerves; as for the nerves of pleasure, I
know no author who has hazarded such a hypothesis, however
tentatively. It is true that one of those who admit the existence of
nerves of pain (Frey) gets out of the difficulty very easily by
saying that pleasure, consisting only in the absence of pain,
requires no special nerves. May we not say, then, that it is a
complete falsification of the meaning of words to class among
sensations psychical phenomena answering to none of the required
anatomical or physiological conditions?[33]
-----
Footnote 33:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account