Social problems; United States -- Social conditions -- 1865-1918
It is fortunate that their dislike of their native land has been strong
enough to take them away and to keep them away; it is a pity that the
migrating impulse does not seize upon more of their kind. The world has
room for idlers--it has room for all sorts of people. But America has
no room for them. That great workshop wants no idlers obstructing the
aisles and hindering the toilers at their tasks. That would be a sorry
day for us when our rapidly growing leisure class should “civilize” and
“refine” America into an agreeable place of residence for “ladies” and
“gentlemen” of the European pattern.
These Americans who have “outgrown” their country serve to confirm
Europe in the suspicions raised by the news that has reached it of
stupendous aristocratic changes in the American people, of rotten
political machines ruled by the rich, of toll-gates set up on every
highway of American trade and commerce for the tax-gatherers of
plutocracy, of a people fatuously imagining that it is free because it
can go to the polls and freely choose which of two sets of candidates
shielded by the plutocracy shall make and execute the laws. This brings
up the whole subject of our relations with “abroad”--and the social and
political meaning and tendency of those relations.
A few years ago Paris was the paradise of Americans, especially of the
Americans of wealth. It is so no longer. It is now for them a mere
stopping-place for buying clothes--a pause _en route_ to the true,
fashionable, American Mecca, London. A few years ago Americans, except
those of the ordinary sight-seeing, mind-improving kind, loathed
London. They knew few people there--and, like Vienna, London is an
impossible place for the stranger in search of amusement; if he does
not know natives, is not invited to their houses, a soundless desert is
a cheerful, companionable place in comparison. Further, such English as
the rich, fashionable, amusement-hunting American knew--that is, such
Englishmen “of the right sort”--were about as friendly and sociable
as they are to their servants. But that was before the “Anglo-Saxon
Alliance.”
The change came with the British discovery that the American
multi-millionaire and the American heiress were not, as had been
supposed, rarities found only occasionally after long search through
trackless and vast wildernesses of “unspeakable bounders,” but were
deposited in “the States” in quantities, were easily accessible,
were yearning for high society, for aristocracy, for titled friends,
for titled alliances. This was tidings of great joy to the English
aristocracy. For an aristocrat may not work; and no matter how heavily
“endowed” a title may be, values will shrink as time passes--not to
speak of those savage “death duties” which the rascally Liberals
enacted to the infuriating of the upper classes, who yet dare not
repeal them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account