Books -- History -- 400-1450; Manuscripts; Paleography
The most important systems of writing, for many centuries--from a
time long previous to the Christian Era and on throughout the Middle
Ages--were those which employed the classic Greek and Latin alphabets,
and in which the great body of the world's best literature was written.
At least this was true within the bounds of Europe. With the declining
literary importance of Alexandria came the growing prominence of the
region north of the Mediterranean. The Greek alphabet and language held
preëminence for centuries, beginning with Alexander's conquest and
extending into the early Christian centuries when they were displaced,
early in the Middle Ages, under the Latin ascendency. During the
increasing domination of the Latin alphabet and literature, national
and provincial "hands" were developed and came into active competition
in the centuries previous to the invention of printing. The handwriting
which was of specifically Roman lineage was gradually modified by
environing conditions in the different sections of Europe and resulted
in various "hands," as the "Lombardic" hand of Italy, the "Visigothic"
hand of Spain, and the "Merovingian" and (later) the "Carolingian" hand
of the Frankish Empire.
(_6_) _The Anglo-Saxon writing._ The Anglo-Saxon handwriting is an
inheritance from the Latin national hand. In this "descent" (or, is
it "ascent"?) of our modern English "hand," in the long process of
its genealogy, the Latin displaced the earlier Greek, as the Greek
had won its way over the still earlier Phœnician and Hebrew. In our
modern English literature we employ the Roman alphabet (as other
nationalities are coming more and more to do). The Roman characters,
being descended immediately from the Latin, though modified more or
less by the Norman domination and other factors, constitute what may be
called the cosmopolitan alphabet of modern times. The characters used
in our Anglo-Saxon writing have come to their present ascendency and
increasing supremacy from two reasons in particular: First, because
the Latin on which it was based was the language of the educated
classes of all nations during the Middle Ages; and second--and probably
chiefly--because the Roman characters are better adapted for rapid
writing than were the severe though elegant letters of the Greek
language. The shape of the Roman characters greatly facilitated the
adoption of the "running" hand in the Latin literature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account