The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
Indeed, the native name of Heliopolis is suggestive of Asiatic relations.
It is the On of the Old Testament, and was called On of the north to
distinguish it from another On, the modern Erment, in the south. It was
symbolised by a fluted and painted column of wood,(58) in which some have
seen an emblem of the sun-god, like the sun-pillars of Semitic faith. But
the name of On was not confined to Egypt. There was another Heliopolis in
Syria, called On of the Beka’a by Amos (i. 5), where the sun-god was
worshipped under the form of a stone. And in Palestine itself Beth-el,
“the house of God,” was known in earlier ages as Beth-On. It is true that
the name of On may have been carried into Asia in the days when the Hyksos
dynasties ruled over Egypt, but it is more probable that both Beth-On and
the On near Damascus go back to an older date. In any case they testify to
some kind of contact between the sun-worship of Heliopolis in Egypt and
that of Syria and Palestine.(59)
Between Tum, the sun-god of Northern Egypt, and Horus, the sun-god of the
South, there was one notable difference. While Horus was a hawk, Tum was a
man. In this respect, again, he resembled the gods of Babylonia, who are
always depicted in human form. It is difficult to find any other Egyptian
deity who was similarly fortunate. Osiris, indeed, was originally a man,
but at an early date he became confounded with his symbol, the ram, in his
title of “lord of Daddu.” Professor Maspero thinks that Khnum at the
Cataract may also have been originally a man; but if so, he too became a
ram before the beginning of history. Ptaḥ of Memphis and Anher of This are
the only other gods who appear consistently in human shape, and Ptaḥ is a
mummy, while Anher, like Tum, was the sun.(60)
With the adoption of the Ennead and the cosmological ideas it embodied, a
new element entered into the theology of the Egyptian temples. This was
the identification of one god with another, or, to speak more exactly, the
loss of their individuality on the part of the gods. The process was begun
when the priests of Heliopolis took such of the divinities as were
recognised throughout Egypt, and transmuted them into successive phases in
the creative action of their local god. It was completed when other
religious centres followed the example of Heliopolis, and formed Enneads
of their own. In each case the local god stood of necessity at the head of
the Ennead, and in each case also he was assimilated to Tum. Whatever may
have previously been his attributes, he thus became a form of the sun-god.
A dual personality was created, which soon melted into one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account