The Revelation of St. John the Divine : $b An interpretationAmes, A. H. (Alfred Henno)
Religion
The Revelation of St. John the Divine : $b An interpretation
Ames, A. H. (Alfred Henno)
Bible. Revelation -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
In recent times many German and other scholars, mainly for reasons
based on a special theory of the date of the Revelation, prefer the
words Nero Cæsar, which, written in Hebrew letters, number six hundred
and sixty-six. Irenæus (died about 202), who attempted the problem, out
of many names preferred Teitan, possibly to suggest an analogy between
the attempts of Roman emperors to crush the Church and the unsuccessful
war of the Titans against the gods, without venturing to put forth his
opinions in more definite form. Very many other names of men, ancient
and modern, have been proposed, with greater or less plausibility; for
curiosity to decipher numerical symbols, when it possesses a man, holds
him with almost the fascination of gambling. But it is apparent that
the combination of names possible with only a few letters is so much
beyond computation that almost apostolical inspiration is requisite to
decide upon the right one.
To the word “Lateinos,” strong as are its claims, the objection lies
that the Roman or Latin empire can scarcely be meant, since the beast
John describes is evidently a spiritual power, not a secular one. Nor
can the Roman Church be meant, for it was not known as Latin in the
days of the apostle, nor for centuries afterward; and, as one design
of the Apocalypse was to comfort and instruct the generation in which
John lived, it would have been inconsistent with that design to select
a name which could have no meaning intelligible to it or to many
generations succeeding. There is wisdom in the words of Bleek:¹ “The
discovery that a definite name contains this number as the value of its
letters in Greek would not warrant us to assume the correctness of the
interpretation if other hints in the book respecting the beast did not
agree.”
¹ _Lectures on the Apocalypse_, p. 87. London, Williams &
Norgate, 1875.
Another explanation offered is that the number six hundred and
sixty-six is but a threefold repetition of the number six, John thus
intending to mark in the most emphatic manner that, however mighty the
power or long the duration of the beast shall be, it will inevitably
fall short of the completeness and permanence of Christ’s kingdom, as
six is less than seven.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account