The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go outO'Brien, James Bronterre
History
The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go out
O'Brien, James Bronterre
Labor; Labor movement; Slavery; Social problems; Working class
The slaves, on their side, appear to have been perfectly reconciled
to slavery as an institution. The writings of the ancients have left
us nothing to countervail this opinion, but, on the contrary, much
to confirm it. We can nowhere discover any evidence to show that the
slaves of antiquity regarded slavery in any other light than as an
institution natural in itself, and neither unjust nor unreasonable,
provided they (the slaves) were well treated. It is true they often
complained of their lot, and sometimes rebelled, too, in order
to change it; but, in so doing, it is to be observed, they never
complained of slavery _as an institution_, nor invoked the principle of
Equality as the end and object of their complaints or rebellions. Their
complaint was, not that slavery existed, but that they, themselves,
and not others, were the slaves. And when they rebelled, it was not
in order to put down slavery and establish liberty for all; it was to
exchange conditions with their masters, or else to secure their own
freedom at the price of taking away other people’s. The idea of making
common cause with other slaves, in order to emancipate all slaves,
never entered their heads. Principle, or love of equality, had nothing
whatever to do with their movements. The principle of _liberty for
all_ was too sublime an idea for them. Equality before God and the law
was still further beyond them. Slavery, _as a principle_, they had
no fault to find with; they complained only of the _accident_ that
made them slaves and others free. Even of this the vast majority never
complained, because the vast majority (there is reason to believe) were
content with their lot, and satisfied with their masters’ treatment of
them. Indeed, the whole tenour of what we read of in history respecting
slaves leads to this conclusion. The vast majority were content with
their condition. In general they were kindly treated; and as they knew
no other state, and saw nothing unjust or unreasonable in slavery, they
were attached to their masters as to benefactors (regarding them as the
authors of their comfort), and might, mayhap, as a general rule, be
pronounced happy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account