=C.=--The third division is one for which we have little direct, but
plenty of indirect, evidence, and the remains of which are with us upon
every side. It is the growth in the Early Middle Ages, presumably from
about the Angevin period, of the mediaeval road system which was the
deflection and extension of the old Roman road system. At the end of
the Empire, during the Dark Ages (_i.e._ from the fifth to the eleventh
century), though the Roman road system had remained the only available
one, it had decayed, and numerous modifications of it had already
appeared; but with the Early Middle Ages those modifications seem to
have grown prodigiously, and the indirect network of local roads would
then seem to have arisen.
=D.=--The fourth chapter is even more obscure. It is a partial decline,
only affecting certain districts, and affecting some much more than
others: a decline which corresponds more or less to the end of the
sixteenth and the beginning of the seventeenth century. It went with
the flooding of the fen lands, with the breakdown of central authority,
the increase of local interests, and so on.
=E.=--The fifth chapter is the great revolution in road planning and
construction which may be called the turnpike era: beginning early in
the eighteenth century and flourishing at its close.
The turnpike system continued to develop with continual changes
through three or four generations. It survived the competition of the
railroads. It was vastly improved by the new local legislation of
from forty to twenty years ago. It left us with the road system we
now enjoy, which must, under the pressure of quite recent changes, be
modified if our communications are to be saved, or, at any rate, to
keep pace with the present conditions of travel.
CHAPTER X THE TRACKWAYS
_The Three Divisions of the British Pre-Roman Road System--The System
of which Salisbury Plain was the “Hub”: The System Connected with
London: Cross-Country Communications--The Three Factors which Have
Determined Travel in Britain._
i
The origin of the trackways is, of course, unknown, and can only be
guessed at by inference; but their character, and especially the
geographical causes which determined their trace, we can establish on
the largest lines with some accuracy.
We must not lose ourselves in that kind of speculation which has been
so dear to the academies, and which is usually very futile. As to the
order in which the development took place we have no evidence whatever:
for instance, as to the date of the founding of London, or of its size
before the Roman occupation; nor have we similar evidence with regard
to any of the centres of England for the uniting of which roads would
arise. But we have relics of the trackways before us. We have the
geographical conditions almost unchanged, and we have the indication
of Roman roads clearly based upon particular existing trackways, and
therefore suggesting what the scheme was before the Roman engineers set
to work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account