Next, we may presume (for evidence is lost, especially under the later
Roman work) there was a track towards the centre of Norfolk. Next there
was some great road going northward east of the Pennines, following
the dry land which skirts the Fens and reaching the great fertile
plain of York, and so on northward through Durham up to the crossings
of the Tyne. Where this original main track went we cannot say. We
know the trace of the Roman road which followed it. We may presume
that the divagations and modifications of this road of the Dark Ages
and the Middle Ages, which ultimately built up our main road to the
north, reverted in some degree to the original track. But the whole
thing is guess-work. One thing seems fairly certain: this eastern road
to the north (the twin to the great north-western road by Chester to
Lancashire) must have split about half way to York, one branch making
directly to the plain of York itself, the other obviously running along
the inevitable ridge which points right north through Lincolnshire to
the Humber. There is here no bridge possible. It is not too broad for
a ferry. But though the Roman road, superseding the earlier trackway,
went on northward, it is a fair guess that the original trackway
stopped at the river.
Of cross roads we have fragments, of course, in the Pennines, but
we know nothing of their history. It is clear that the main cross
communications between the peopled area of the Yorkshire Plain and that
of the Lancashire Plain must have gone over by Shipley--the obvious gap
in the chain. But more we cannot tell. That is the natural way, and
there was, so to speak, no avoiding it. What was mainly used further
south we cannot tell. It was a tangled land. There is no clear and
certain trace of cross communications which must have existed across
the Midlands south of Trent. We do not know what great patches of
wood may here have determined the windings of an original road. There
are no serious obstacles (it is high land and dry, with no marshes or
large watercourses), but there was less reason for continual traffic
here from east to west than there was for traffic from north to south;
therefore there was less “potential” than was created by the traffic on
cross communications further south.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account